RBGLY vs. CRDO
RBGLY (Reckitt Benckiser Group plc) and CRDO (Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd) are both stocks. RBGLY operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while CRDO operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, RBGLY returned 3.89%/yr vs 139.02%/yr for CRDO. Their -0.00 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
RBGLY vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBGLY achieves a -9.07% return, which is significantly lower than CRDO's 56.11% return.
RBGLY
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- 6M
- -14.12%
- YTD
- -9.07%
- 1Y
- 0.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- 0.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.23%
CRDO
- 1D
- -5.59%
- 1M
- -15.41%
- 6M
- 131.70%
- YTD
- 56.11%
- 1Y
- 103.67%
- 3Y*
- 139.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 90.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.22B | $1.31B | $1.89B | |
| $6.16M | $7.05M | $9.77M |
RBGLY vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBGLY Reckitt Benckiser Group plc | -9.07% | 40.48% | -8.32% | 0.50% | -14.78% |
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 56.11% | 114.09% | 245.20% | 46.28% | 10.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBGLY and CRDO is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022 | -0.00 |
The correlation between RBGLY and CRDO shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RBGLY:
$45.88B
CRDO:
$41.89B
RBGLY:
£1.26
CRDO:
$2.48
RBGLY:
8.49
CRDO:
90.74
RBGLY:
0.18
CRDO:
0.08
RBGLY:
1.26
CRDO:
32.10
RBGLY:
6.17
CRDO:
20.97
RBGLY:
£27.62B
CRDO:
$1.34B
RBGLY:
£16.62B
CRDO:
$908.35M
RBGLY:
£7.31B
CRDO:
$463.79M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBGLY vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank
RBGLY
CRDO
RBGLY vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RBGLY) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBGLY | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.21 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 1.95 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | 4.39 | -4.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBGLY vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBGLY drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, smaller than the maximum CRDO drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBGLY and CRDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBGLY | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.53% | -62.04% | +17.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.14% | -53.59% | +23.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.14% | -61.05% | +30.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.77% | -25.75% | +8.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.46% | -19.40% | +5.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.63% | 23.71% | -8.08% |
Volatility
RBGLY vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RBGLY) is 8.90%, while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a volatility of 29.21%. This indicates that RBGLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBGLY | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.90% | 29.21% | -20.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.34% | 73.28% | -52.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.93% | 92.33% | -69.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 82.50% | -58.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 82.50% | -58.12% |
Dividends
RBGLY vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison
RBGLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%, while CRDO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBGLY Reckitt Benckiser Group plc | 8.32% | 3.34% | 4.17% | 3.36% | 3.14% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 2.52% | 2.86% | 3.50% | 3.19% | 2.08% |
Financials
RBGLY vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reckitt Benckiser Group plc and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RBGLY vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison
RBGLY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a gross profit of 3.76B and revenue of 6.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.
CRDO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.
RBGLY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported an operating income of 1.17B and revenue of 6.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
CRDO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.
RBGLY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a net income of 656.81M and revenue of 6.46B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.
CRDO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RBGLY and CRDO have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRDO has higher volatility (29.21%) compared to RBGLY (8.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBGLY dropped -44.53% vs CRDO's -62.04%.
CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBGLY and CRDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer