RBGLY vs. PG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RBGLY (Reckitt Benckiser Group plc) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. Both operate in the Household & Personal Products industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, RBGLY returned -2.01%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for PG. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RBGLY vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RBGLY) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBGLY achieves a -23.60% return, which is significantly lower than PG's -0.30% return. Over the past 10 years, RBGLY has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -2.01%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.41% annualized return.

RBGLY

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -5.67%
• YTD: -23.60%
• 6M: -22.07%
• 1Y: -7.97%
• 3Y*: -4.80%
• 5Y*: -4.68%
• 10Y*: -2.01%

PG

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -4.37%
• YTD: -0.30%
• 6M: -2.04%
• 1Y: -13.65%
• 3Y*: 1.28%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: 8.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBGLY vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RBGLY Reckitt Benckiser Group plc	-23.60%	40.48%	-8.32%	0.50%	-17.22%	-0.65%	12.14%	12.52%	-18.38%	17.03%
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	-0.30%	-12.26%	17.25%	-0.86%	-5.05%	20.52%	14.15%	39.70%	3.57%	12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between RBGLY and PG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2008	0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap RBGLY : $39.59B PG : $340.29B
EPS RBGLY : $1.37 PG : $5.23
PE Ratio RBGLY : 8.84 PG : 26.94
PEG Ratio RBGLY : 0.19 PG : 6.59
PS Ratio RBGLY : 1.43 PG : 3.95
PB Ratio RBGLY : 5.12 PG : 6.30
Total Revenue (TTM) RBGLY : $28.33B PG : $86.72B
Gross Profit (TTM) RBGLY : $17.20B PG : $43.64B
EBITDA (TTM) RBGLY : $7.66B PG : $22.63B

Return for Risk

RBGLY vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBGLY

RBGLY Risk / Return Rank: 26
RBGLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
RBGLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
RBGLY Omega Ratio Rank: 21
RBGLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
RBGLY Martin Ratio Rank: 28

PG

PG Risk / Return Rank: 9
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 13
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBGLY vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RBGLY) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RBGLY	PG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.36	-0.75	+0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.39	-0.97	+0.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	0.89	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.26	-0.89	+0.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.66	-1.49	+0.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RBGLY vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBGLY Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is higher than the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBGLY and PG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RBGLY	PG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.36	-0.75	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	0.19	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.08	0.44	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.46	-0.23

Drawdowns

RBGLY vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBGLY drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, smaller than the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBGLY and PG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBGLY	PG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.53%	-54.25%	+9.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.08%	-16.12%	-13.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.47%	-21.15%	-11.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.91%	-23.77%	-16.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.53%	-23.77%	-20.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.08%	-18.39%	-11.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.35%	-12.16%	-1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.00%	9.89%	+2.11%

Volatility

RBGLY vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RBGLY) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 6.66%. This indicates that RBGLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBGLY	PG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.70%	6.66%	+1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.91%	14.82%	+3.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.42%	18.27%	+4.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.93%	17.72%	+6.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.40%	19.00%	+5.40%

Dividends

RBGLY vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

RBGLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.90%, more than PG's 3.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	3.02%	2.91%	2.36%	2.55%	2.38%	2.08%	2.24%	2.37%	3.09%	2.98%	3.18%	3.31%
RBGLY Reckitt Benckiser Group plc	9.90%	3.34%	4.17%	3.36%	3.14%	2.75%	2.38%	2.52%	2.86%	3.50%	3.19%	2.08%

Financials

RBGLY vs. PG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Reckitt Benckiser Group plc and The Procter & Gamble Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RBGLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a gross profit of 4.35B and revenue of 7.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.

PG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

RBGLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported an operating income of 2.70B and revenue of 7.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.6%.

PG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

RBGLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a net income of 2.21B and revenue of 7.18B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.

PG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBGLY and PG in my portfolio?

RBGLY and PG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RBGLY or PG?

RBGLY has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to PG (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBGLY dropped -44.53% vs PG's -54.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBGLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.