PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBGLY vs. WMMVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RBGLY vs. WMMVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RBGLY) and Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR (WMMVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBGLY achieves a -23.67% return, which is significantly lower than WMMVY's -3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RBGLY has underperformed WMMVY with an annualized return of -2.02%, while WMMVY has yielded a comparatively higher 5.37% annualized return.


RBGLY

1D
-0.08%
1M
-5.01%
YTD
-23.67%
6M
-22.13%
1Y
-8.11%
3Y*
-4.82%
5Y*
-4.95%
10Y*
-2.02%

WMMVY

1D
0.40%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
-3.18%
6M
-6.34%
1Y
-6.98%
3Y*
-4.86%
5Y*
1.68%
10Y*
5.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBGLY vs. WMMVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc
-23.67%40.48%-8.32%0.50%-17.22%-0.65%12.14%12.52%-18.38%17.03%
WMMVY
Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR
-3.18%21.40%-35.04%24.21%-3.70%35.33%1.62%15.94%6.58%41.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RBGLY and WMMVY is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.16

The correlation between RBGLY and WMMVY shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (5 years) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RBGLY:

$39.56B

WMMVY:

$52.39B

EPS

RBGLY:

$1.37

WMMVY:

$28.68

PE Ratio

RBGLY:

8.83

WMMVY:

1.05

PEG Ratio

RBGLY:

0.18

WMMVY:

0.56

PS Ratio

RBGLY:

1.43

WMMVY:

0.05

PB Ratio

RBGLY:

5.12

WMMVY:

0.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

RBGLY:

$28.33B

WMMVY:

$1.01T

Gross Profit (TTM)

RBGLY:

$17.20B

WMMVY:

$244.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

RBGLY:

$7.66B

WMMVY:

$98.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Reckitt Benckiser Group plc

Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR

Return for Risk

RBGLY vs. WMMVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBGLY
RBGLY Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
RBGLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBGLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBGLY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RBGLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBGLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

WMMVY
WMMVY Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
WMMVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMMVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMMVY Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
WMMVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMMVY Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBGLY vs. WMMVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RBGLY) and Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR (WMMVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RBGLYWMMVYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.36

-0.26

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.41

-0.20

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.98

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

-0.35

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.67

-0.90

+0.23

RBGLY vs. WMMVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBGLY Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the WMMVY Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBGLY and WMMVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBGLYWMMVYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

-0.26

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.06

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

0.17

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.16

+0.07

Drawdowns

RBGLY vs. WMMVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBGLY drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, which is greater than WMMVY's maximum drawdown of -39.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBGLY and WMMVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBGLYWMMVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.53%

-39.68%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.14%

-20.18%

-9.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.47%

-39.68%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.91%

-39.68%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.53%

-39.68%

-4.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.14%

-24.72%

-5.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.36%

-11.90%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.15%

7.78%

+4.37%

Volatility

RBGLY vs. WMMVY - Volatility Comparison

Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RBGLY) and Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR (WMMVY) have volatilities of 7.68% and 7.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBGLYWMMVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.68%

7.85%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.73%

17.96%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.42%

26.81%

-4.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.93%

29.92%

-5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.40%

30.84%

-6.44%

Dividends

RBGLY vs. WMMVY - Dividend Comparison

RBGLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.91%, more than WMMVY's 3.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc
9.91%3.34%4.17%3.36%3.14%2.75%2.38%2.52%2.86%3.50%3.19%2.08%
WMMVY
Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR
3.03%2.93%3.99%3.13%2.11%2.10%3.08%3.12%2.28%3.60%4.71%0.00%

Financials

RBGLY vs. WMMVY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reckitt Benckiser Group plc and Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B202120222023202420252026
7.18B
245.02B
(RBGLY) Total Revenue
(WMMVY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RBGLY vs. WMMVY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Reckitt Benckiser Group plc and Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202120222023202420252026
60.6%
24.3%
Portfolio components
RBGLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a gross profit of 4.35B and revenue of 7.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.

WMMVY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR reported a gross profit of 59.59B and revenue of 245.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.3%.

RBGLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported an operating income of 2.70B and revenue of 7.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.6%.

WMMVY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR reported an operating income of 18.47B and revenue of 245.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.

RBGLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a net income of 2.21B and revenue of 7.18B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.

WMMVY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR reported a net income of 12.50B and revenue of 245.02B, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RBGLY and WMMVY have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMMVY has higher volatility (7.85%) compared to RBGLY (7.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBGLY dropped -44.53% vs WMMVY's -39.68%.

WMMVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.26 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBGLY and WMMVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer