RBGLY vs. JIVE
RBGLY (Reckitt Benckiser Group plc) is a stock, while JIVE (Jpmorgan International Value ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Over the past year, RBGLY returned -8.11% vs 42.79% for JIVE. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RBGLY vs. JIVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBGLY achieves a -23.67% return, which is significantly lower than JIVE's 15.75% return.
RBGLY
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -23.67%
- 6M
- -22.13%
- 1Y
- -8.11%
- 3Y*
- -4.82%
- 5Y*
- -4.95%
- 10Y*
- -2.02%
JIVE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 6M
- 20.07%
- 1Y
- 42.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBGLY vs. JIVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RBGLY Reckitt Benckiser Group plc | -23.67% | 40.48% | -8.32% | -3.58% |
JIVE Jpmorgan International Value ETF | 15.75% | 49.80% | 11.22% | 5.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBGLY and JIVE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBGLY vs. JIVE — Risk / Return Rank
RBGLY
JIVE
RBGLY vs. JIVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RBGLY) and Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBGLY | JIVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.53 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 4.07 | -4.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 15.74 | -16.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBGLY | JIVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 | 2.98 | -3.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 2.01 | -1.77 |
Drawdowns
RBGLY vs. JIVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBGLY drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, which is greater than JIVE's maximum drawdown of -13.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBGLY and JIVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBGLY | JIVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.53% | -13.79% | -30.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.14% | -10.57% | -19.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.14% | -1.02% | -29.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.36% | -1.96% | -11.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.15% | 2.73% | +9.42% |
Volatility
RBGLY vs. JIVE - Volatility Comparison
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RBGLY) has a higher volatility of 7.68% compared to Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE) at 4.93%. This indicates that RBGLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JIVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBGLY | JIVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.68% | 4.93% | +2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.73% | 11.99% | +5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.42% | 14.46% | +7.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.93% | 14.97% | +8.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 14.97% | +9.43% |
Dividends
RBGLY vs. JIVE - Dividend Comparison
RBGLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.91%, more than JIVE's 2.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIVE Jpmorgan International Value ETF | 2.48% | 2.88% | 2.48% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBGLY Reckitt Benckiser Group plc | 9.91% | 3.34% | 4.17% | 3.36% | 3.14% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 2.52% | 2.86% | 3.50% | 3.19% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBGLY and JIVE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBGLY has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to JIVE (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBGLY dropped -44.53% vs JIVE's -13.79%.
JIVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBGLY and JIVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer