PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOVT vs. BKNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NOVT vs. BKNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Novanta Inc. (NOVT) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOVT achieves a 27.19% return, which is significantly higher than BKNG's -20.76% return. Over the past 10 years, NOVT has outperformed BKNG with an annualized return of 25.54%, while BKNG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.35% annualized return.


NOVT

1D
-2.78%
1M
-5.23%
YTD
27.19%
6M
23.68%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
-3.56%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*
25.54%

BKNG

1D
0.70%
1M
5.16%
YTD
-20.76%
6M
-21.98%
1Y
-20.14%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
13.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOVT vs. BKNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOVT
Novanta Inc.
27.19%-22.11%-9.29%23.95%-22.95%49.15%33.67%40.38%26.00%138.10%
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
-20.76%8.59%41.31%76.02%-16.00%7.72%8.45%19.24%-0.88%18.53%

Correlation

The correlation between NOVT and BKNG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.38

The correlation between NOVT and BKNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOVT:

$6.23B

BKNG:

$134.14B

EPS

NOVT:

$1.41

BKNG:

$7.60

PE Ratio

NOVT:

107.02

BKNG:

22.23

PEG Ratio

NOVT:

29.84

BKNG:

0.33

PS Ratio

NOVT:

5.72

BKNG:

4.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOVT:

$1.00B

BKNG:

$27.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOVT:

$444.51M

BKNG:

$22.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

NOVT:

$150.84M

BKNG:

$9.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOVT vs. BKNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOVT
NOVT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
NOVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOVT Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
NOVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOVT Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BKNG
BKNG Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BKNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BKNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOVT vs. BKNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novanta Inc. (NOVT) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOVTBKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.91

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

-0.61

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.81

-1.12

+2.93

NOVT vs. BKNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOVT Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the BKNG Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOVT and BKNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOVT vs. BKNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOVT drawdown since its inception was -46.71%, smaller than the maximum BKNG drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOVT and BKNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOVTBKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.71%

-99.32%

+52.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.97%

-33.35%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.71%

-33.35%

-13.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.71%

-39.53%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.71%

-47.77%

+1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.72%

-26.77%

+8.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.30%

-47.03%

+34.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.91%

17.97%

-5.06%

Volatility

NOVT vs. BKNG - Volatility Comparison

Novanta Inc. (NOVT) has a higher volatility of 13.11% compared to Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) at 9.15%. This indicates that NOVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOVTBKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.11%

9.15%

+3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.56%

27.45%

+7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.77%

32.48%

+17.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.21%

32.40%

+7.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.05%

32.32%

+6.73%

Dividends

NOVT vs. BKNG - Dividend Comparison

NOVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


PositionTTM20252024
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
0.95%0.72%0.70%
NOVT
Novanta Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NOVT vs. BKNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Novanta Inc. and Booking Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
257.71M
5.53B
(NOVT) Total Revenue
(BKNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NOVT vs. BKNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Novanta Inc. and Booking Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
44.1%
0
Portfolio components
NOVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novanta Inc. reported a gross profit of 113.58M and revenue of 257.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.1%.

BKNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NOVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novanta Inc. reported an operating income of 27.54M and revenue of 257.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

BKNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.

NOVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novanta Inc. reported a net income of 21.10M and revenue of 257.71M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.

BKNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NOVT and BKNG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOVT has higher volatility (13.11%) compared to BKNG (9.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOVT dropped -46.71% vs BKNG's -99.32%.

NOVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOVT and BKNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer