PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBAIX vs. PALDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBAIX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund I Class (RBAIX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBAIX achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's 7.25% return.


RBAIX

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.33%
YTD
6.25%
6M
5.80%
1Y
16.88%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
9.92%

PALDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.80%
YTD
7.25%
6M
6.72%
1Y
19.39%
3Y*
16.29%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBAIX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBAIX
T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund I Class
6.25%16.23%11.87%18.12%-17.14%13.45%14.64%22.71%-4.82%3.49%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
7.25%13.62%18.96%18.90%-15.65%16.30%10.68%22.27%-4.12%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RBAIX and PALDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017

0.93

The correlation between RBAIX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBAIX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBAIX
RBAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RBAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
RBAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

PALDX
PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBAIX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund I Class (RBAIX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBAIXPALDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.46

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.39

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.92

15.68

-4.76

RBAIX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBAIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBAIX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBAIX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBAIX drawdown since its inception was -25.49%, roughly equal to the maximum PALDX drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBAIX and PALDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBAIXPALDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.49%

-26.16%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-5.96%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.40%

-16.06%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.32%

-20.47%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.59%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-4.07%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.29%

+0.32%

Volatility

RBAIX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund I Class (RBAIX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) have volatilities of 3.25% and 3.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBAIXPALDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

3.21%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.41%

6.74%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.78%

8.35%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.02%

12.17%

-1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.58%

12.69%

-1.11%

RBAIX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBAIX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBAIX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

RBAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, more than PALDX's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
5.05%5.42%10.40%2.94%6.19%6.87%2.58%4.58%3.65%1.48%0.00%
RBAIX
T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund I Class
7.10%7.44%7.43%3.92%5.27%9.43%4.70%4.97%8.56%6.16%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, RBAIX and PALDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RBAIX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to PALDX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBAIX dropped -25.49% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBAIX and PALDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer