RAVI vs. FLTR
RAVI (FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RAVI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by FlexShares, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. RAVI is actively managed, while FLTR is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RAVI returned 2.68%/yr vs 3.51%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RAVI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
RAVI vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RAVI achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 2.03% return. Over the past 10 years, RAVI has underperformed FLTR with an annualized return of 2.68%, while FLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 3.51% annualized return.
RAVI
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
FLTR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.51%
RAVI vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAVI FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.66% | 4.98% | 5.67% | 5.55% | 0.15% | -0.04% | 2.06% | 3.49% | 1.65% | 1.22% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 2.03% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.44% | 5.70% | 0.30% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between RAVI and FLTR is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAVI vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
RAVI
FLTR
RAVI vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RAVI | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +12.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.64 | 3.13 | +2.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 38.65 | 16.83 | +21.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 231.44 | 100.54 | +130.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RAVI vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAVI drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAVI and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAVI | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -17.84% | +14.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.12% | -0.31% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.36% | -1.93% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.28% | -3.06% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.72% | -17.84% | +14.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -0.67% | +0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.05% | -0.03% |
Volatility
RAVI vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI) is 0.10%, while VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) has a volatility of 0.26%. This indicates that RAVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAVI | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | 0.26% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.30% | 0.63% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40% | 0.78% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.41% | 2.13% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.28% | 5.00% | -3.72% |
RAVI vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAVI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RAVI vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
RAVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than FLTR's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
RAVI FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.38% | 4.59% | 5.34% | 4.55% | 1.70% | 0.90% | 1.29% | 2.53% | 2.22% | 1.28% | 0.90% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RAVI and FLTR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLTR has higher volatility (0.26%) compared to RAVI (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAVI dropped -3.72% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
On 10-year performance, FLTR leads with 3.51% vs 2.68% for RAVI. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, RAVI has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 3.51% return vs 2.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for RAVI.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.38% for RAVI.
RAVI is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RAVI and 0.14% for FLTR.
RAVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.19 vs 6.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RAVI and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer