RACK vs. NLR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RACK (VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RACK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.

Performance

RACK vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RACK

• 1D: 2.90%
• 1M: -1.52%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

NLR

• 1D: 4.40%
• 1M: -2.96%
• 6M: -22.93%
• YTD: -10.20%
• 1Y: 2.02%
• 3Y*: 25.60%
• 5Y*: 19.34%
• 10Y*: 11.59%
• ALL TIME*: 3.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	$43.04M	$48.04M	$60.39M
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF	$1.13M	$2.03M	$2.83M

RACK vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF	-10.35%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	-15.41%

Correlation

The correlation between RACK and NLR is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026	0.77

Return for Risk

RACK vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RACK

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 13
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 14
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RACK vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RACK	NLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.05	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.38	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.04	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.05	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.12	—

Drawdowns

RACK vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RACK drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RACK and NLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RACK	NLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.97%	-65.05%	+43.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-37.52%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-37.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.50%	-32.15%	+18.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.48%	-35.66%	+26.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	17.54%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RACK	NLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.72%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	32.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.87%	44.03%	+7.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.87%	30.20%	+21.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.87%	24.63%	+27.24%

RACK vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RACK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

RACK vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

RACK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.84%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RACK and NLR in my portfolio?

RACK and NLR have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RACK or NLR?

On fees, RACK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RACK or NLR?

RACK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RACK or NLR?

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.00% for RACK.

What is the main difference between RACK and NLR?

RACK is categorized as Technology Equities, while NLR is Uranium. RACK tracks MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RACK and 0.56% for NLR.