RACK vs. ASMH

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

RACK (VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - RACK tracks the MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index while ASMH tracks the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RACK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

RACK vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RACK

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -12.97%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASMH

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -5.89%
• 6M: 31.57%
• YTD: 68.52%
• 1Y: 141.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RACK vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF	-13.96%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	9.28%

Correlation

The correlation between RACK and ASMH is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026	0.77

Return for Risk

RACK vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RACK

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 95
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 90
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RACK vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RACK	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.32	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.69	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.45	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	9.65	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	27.84	—

Drawdowns

RACK vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RACK drawdown since its inception was -16.98%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RACK and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	RACK	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.98%	-15.89%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.98%	-12.03%	-4.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.46%	-4.43%	-3.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RACK	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.57%	42.93%	+7.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.57%	41.24%	+9.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.57%	41.24%	+9.33%

RACK vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RACK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

RACK vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

RACK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.66%	0.19%
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RACK and ASMH in my portfolio?

RACK and ASMH have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RACK or ASMH?

On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RACK or ASMH?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RACK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RACK or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.00% for RACK.

What is the main difference between RACK and ASMH?

RACK tracks MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while ASMH tracks ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RACK and 0.19% for ASMH.