PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAAX vs. EAOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RAAX vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RAAX vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RAAX
VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF
17.41%26.74%12.50%6.71%1.51%21.56%22.31%
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
-1.25%18.41%13.79%18.27%-17.76%14.52%19.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAAX achieves a 17.41% return, which is significantly higher than EAOA's -1.25% return.


RAAX

1D
0.74%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
17.41%
6M
21.48%
1Y
37.59%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*

EAOA

1D
0.81%
1M
-4.05%
YTD
-1.25%
6M
0.95%
1Y
17.60%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RAAX vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RAAX vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAAX
RAAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
RAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOA
EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAAX vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RAAXEAOADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.30

1.25

+1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.93

1.83

+1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.26

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

1.81

+1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.54

8.18

+8.36

RAAX vs. EAOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the EAOA Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAAX and EAOA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAAXEAOADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.25

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.54

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.80

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between RAAX and EAOA is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RAAX vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison

RAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than EAOA's 2.12% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
RAAX
VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF
1.99%2.34%1.91%3.66%1.53%8.72%6.27%2.37%0.56%
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.12%2.10%2.09%2.21%1.93%1.48%1.12%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RAAX vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAAX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, which is greater than EAOA's maximum drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAX and EAOA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RAAXEAOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.91%

-25.06%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-9.98%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-25.06%

+1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-5.15%

+2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-5.44%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.21%

+0.08%

Volatility

RAAX vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) is 4.55%, while iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that RAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RAAXEAOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

5.24%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.14%

8.43%

+3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.45%

14.10%

+2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

13.19%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.86%

13.17%

+2.69%