PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QYLD vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QYLD vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 9.47% return. Over the past 10 years, QYLD has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 9.59%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.03% annualized return.


QYLD

1D
0.16%
1M
-2.71%
6M
5.96%
YTD
7.22%
1Y
19.97%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
9.59%
ALL TIME*
8.55%

SPYM

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.60%
6M
7.91%
YTD
9.47%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
15.03%
ALL TIME*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLD vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.22%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
9.47%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and SPYM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.77

The correlation between QYLD and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

QYLD vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QYLD
SPYM

Technology

59.2%
38.5%

Communication Services

13.3%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
4.5%

Industrials

4.1%
8.4%

Healthcare

3.6%
8.9%

Utilities

1.2%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.7%

Energy

0.5%
3.0%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.6%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.8%

Technology

QYLD
59.2%
SPYM
38.5%

Communication Services

QYLD
13.3%
SPYM
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QYLD
10.6%
SPYM
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

QYLD
6.3%
SPYM
4.5%

Industrials

QYLD
4.1%
SPYM
8.4%

Healthcare

QYLD
3.6%
SPYM
8.9%

Utilities

QYLD
1.2%
SPYM
2.2%

Basic Materials

QYLD
1.0%
SPYM
1.7%

Energy

QYLD
0.5%
SPYM
3.0%

Financial Services

QYLD
0.2%
SPYM
11.6%

Real Estate

QYLD
0.1%
SPYM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QYLD vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLD vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QYLDSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.28

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

2.22

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.75

9.63

+10.12

QYLD vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QYLDSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-54.46%

+29.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

-8.90%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-18.72%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

-24.48%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

-33.87%

+9.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-2.01%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-7.12%

+3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

2.05%

-1.04%

Volatility

QYLD vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 3.43%. This indicates that QYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QYLDSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

3.43%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

10.04%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83%

12.60%

-1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.98%

16.90%

-1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

18.00%

-2.40%

QYLD vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

QYLD vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.88%, more than SPYM's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
12.88%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


QYLD and SPYM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QYLD has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to SPYM (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.03% vs 9.59% for QYLD. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.03% return vs 9.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 12.88%, compared with 1.04% for SPYM.

QYLD is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPYM is S&P 500. QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.02% for SPYM.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QYLD and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer