PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QYLD vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QYLD vs. BOTZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QYLD returned 8.26%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.

Performance

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 1.13% return.

QYLD

1D
-1.97%
1M
1.41%
YTD
7.89%
6M
7.59%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
13.99%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
9.99%

BOTZ

1D
-4.41%
1M
-9.06%
YTD
1.13%
6M
0.29%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF		7.89%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF		1.13%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-28.34%58.01%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and BOTZ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016

0.70

The correlation between QYLD and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
QYLD
BOTZ

Technology

58.7%
31.8%

Communication Services

14.3%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
0.0%

Healthcare

3.7%
8.0%

Industrials

2.6%
49.3%

Utilities

1.2%
0.0%

Basic Materials

1.0%
0.0%

Energy

0.5%
0.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.9%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QYLD
58.7%
BOTZ
31.8%

Communication Services

QYLD
14.3%
BOTZ
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QYLD
11.4%
BOTZ
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

QYLD
6.4%
BOTZ
0.0%

Healthcare

QYLD
3.7%
BOTZ
8.0%

Industrials

QYLD
2.6%
BOTZ
49.3%

Utilities

QYLD
1.2%
BOTZ
0.0%

Basic Materials

QYLD
1.0%
BOTZ
0.0%

Energy

QYLD
0.5%
BOTZ
0.5%

Financial Services

QYLD
0.2%
BOTZ
0.9%

Real Estate

QYLD
0.1%
BOTZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF

Often compared with QYLD:
QYLD vs. JEPQQYLD vs. JEPIQYLD vs. QQQQYLD vs. XYLDQYLD vs. RYLDQYLD vs. SCHDQYLD vs. QYLG
Often compared with BOTZ:
BOTZ vs. ROBOBOTZ vs. AIQBOTZ vs. ARKQBOTZ vs. IRBOBOTZ vs. ROBTBOTZ vs. SPYBOTZ vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

QYLD vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QYLDBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.34
0.79

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.28
1.26

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.15

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

1.04

+3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.38

3.34

+22.04

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and BOTZ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QYLDBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-55.54%

+30.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

-19.34%

+14.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-29.02%

+9.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

-55.54%

+30.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-11.99%

+9.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-18.27%

+14.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

6.01%

-5.12%

Volatility

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is 4.78%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 10.19%. This indicates that QYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QYLDBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

10.19%

-5.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

20.13%

-11.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.70%

25.54%

-15.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

27.03%

-12.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

25.83%

-10.27%

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.68%, more than BOTZ's 0.65% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF		0.65%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF		11.68%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

QYLD and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOTZ has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to QYLD (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

On 5-year performance, QYLD leads with 8.26% vs 1.10% for BOTZ. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 8.26% return vs 1.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.68%, compared with 0.65% for BOTZ.

QYLD is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BOTZ is Robotics. QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.68% for BOTZ.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QYLD and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer