QYLD vs. BOTZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ).

QYLD and BOTZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013. BOTZ is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. Both QYLD and BOTZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	0.61%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	10.41%	8.72%	22.69%	-3.07%	18.79%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	-6.43%	14.17%	12.26%	38.97%	-42.69%	8.65%	51.92%	31.80%	-28.34%	58.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's -6.43% return.

QYLD

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -1.11%
• YTD: 0.61%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 16.36%
• 3Y*: 13.19%
• 5Y*: 7.01%
• 10Y*: 8.96%

BOTZ

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -11.23%
• YTD: -6.43%
• 6M: -4.66%
• 1Y: 19.21%
• 3Y*: 10.33%
• 5Y*: 0.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

BOTZ

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF

QYLD

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

Return for Risk

QYLD vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 68
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 85

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 38
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QYLD	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	0.69	+0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	1.19	+0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.15	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	1.03	+0.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.32	3.71	+6.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and BOTZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QYLD	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	0.69	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.01	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.37	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and BOTZ is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%, more than BOTZ's 0.70% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.85%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.70%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and BOTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QYLD	BOTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.75%	-55.54%	+30.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.84%	-19.34%	+8.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.61%	-55.54%	+30.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.84%	-14.52%	+12.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.89%	-18.56%	+14.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	5.37%	-3.72%

Volatility

QYLD vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is 4.90%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that QYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QYLD	BOTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	8.79%	-3.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.50%	17.74%	-10.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.43%	27.79%	-11.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.84%	26.52%	-11.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.51%	25.68%	-10.17%