QWLD vs. PBUS
QWLD (SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF) and PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - QWLD tracks the MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD) while PBUS tracks the MSCI USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QWLD returned 9.96%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for PBUS. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QWLD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for PBUS.
Performance
QWLD vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QWLD achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly lower than PBUS's 10.82% return.
QWLD
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- 6.55%
- 6M
- 7.32%
- 1Y
- 17.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.35%
- 5Y*
- 9.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.68%
PBUS
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
QWLD vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF | 6.55% | 17.93% | 14.44% | 19.59% | -13.30% | 21.57% | 10.24% | 27.59% | -7.02% | 6.62% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 10.82% | 17.58% | 24.99% | 27.33% | -19.64% | 26.77% | 21.75% | 31.60% | -4.77% | 7.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between QWLD and PBUS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between QWLD and PBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
QWLD vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QWLD
PBUS
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
QWLD
PBUS
Financial Services
QWLD
PBUS
Healthcare
QWLD
PBUS
Communication Services
QWLD
PBUS
Industrials
QWLD
PBUS
Consumer Defensive
QWLD
PBUS
Consumer Cyclical
QWLD
PBUS
Energy
QWLD
PBUS
Utilities
QWLD
PBUS
Basic Materials
QWLD
PBUS
Real Estate
QWLD
PBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QWLD vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank
QWLD
PBUS
QWLD vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QWLD | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 3.08 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | 13.93 | -4.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QWLD | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 2.30 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.80 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.80 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
QWLD vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QWLD drawdown since its inception was -31.89%, roughly equal to the maximum PBUS drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QWLD and PBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QWLD | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.89% | -33.15% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.66% | -9.02% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.40% | -19.07% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.84% | -25.40% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -0.64% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -5.13% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.99% | -0.22% |
Volatility
QWLD vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) is 2.26%, while Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that QWLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QWLD | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 2.94% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | 9.13% | -1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.68% | 12.06% | -2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.53% | 17.05% | -3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 19.33% | -4.15% |
QWLD vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QWLD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
QWLD vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison
QWLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than PBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 0.98% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF | 1.84% | 1.85% | 1.74% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.77% | 1.77% | 2.13% | 2.33% | 2.73% | 2.22% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QWLD and PBUS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBUS has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to QWLD (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QWLD dropped -31.89% vs PBUS's -33.15%.
On 5-year performance, PBUS leads with 13.48% vs 9.96% for QWLD. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PBUS has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for QWLD.
QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.98% for PBUS.
QWLD tracks MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QWLD and 0.04% for PBUS.
PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QWLD and PBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer