QVMM vs. VSMV
QVMM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF) and VSMV (VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVMM is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VSMV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QVMM returned 16.65%/yr vs 16.84%/yr for VSMV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QVMM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for VSMV.
Performance
QVMM vs. VSMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVMM achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly higher than VSMV's 9.29% return.
QVMM
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 6M
- 14.87%
- 1Y
- 26.39%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VSMV
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 24.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
QVMM vs. VSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 14.47% | 8.82% | 13.36% | 15.43% | -13.06% | 6.04% |
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 9.29% | 16.77% | 15.79% | 12.34% | -7.56% | 11.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMM and VSMV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.76 |
The correlation between QVMM and VSMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
QVMM vs. VSMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QVMM
VSMV
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
QVMM
VSMV
Financial Services
QVMM
VSMV
Technology
QVMM
VSMV
Consumer Cyclical
QVMM
VSMV
Healthcare
QVMM
VSMV
Real Estate
QVMM
VSMV
Energy
QVMM
VSMV
Basic Materials
QVMM
VSMV
Consumer Defensive
QVMM
VSMV
Utilities
QVMM
VSMV
Communication Services
QVMM
VSMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVMM vs. VSMV — Risk / Return Rank
QVMM
VSMV
QVMM vs. VSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVMM | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 2.71 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 4.03 | -1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.49 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 4.74 | -1.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.48 | 18.09 | -6.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVMM | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.71 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.82 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
QVMM vs. VSMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMM drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum VSMV drawdown of -31.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMM and VSMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVMM | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.00% | -31.33% | +7.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -5.18% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.00% | -13.22% | -10.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.79% | +0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -3.41% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 1.36% | +0.94% |
Volatility
QVMM vs. VSMV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) at 2.41%. This indicates that QVMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVMM | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 2.41% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.21% | 6.34% | +4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 9.08% | +6.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 12.86% | +6.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 15.04% | +4.44% |
QVMM vs. VSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVMM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VSMV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVMM vs. VSMV - Dividend Comparison
QVMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than VSMV's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 1.16% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.31% | 1.35% | 1.36% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.36% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.42% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVMM and VSMV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QVMM has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to VSMV (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMM dropped -24.00% vs VSMV's -31.33%.
On 3-year performance, VSMV leads with 16.84% vs 16.65% for QVMM. On fees, QVMM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VSMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VSMV has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 16.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVMM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VSMV.
VSMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 1.16% for QVMM.
QVMM is categorized as Multi-factor, while VSMV is Volatility Hedged Equity. QVMM tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VSMV tracks Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QVMM and 0.35% for VSMV.
VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVMM and VSMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer