QVMM vs. RWK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QVMM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF) and RWK (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVMM is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while RWK is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QVMM returned 16.65%/yr vs 18.05%/yr for RWK. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QVMM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RWK.

Performance

QVMM vs. RWK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVMM achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly higher than RWK's 13.47% return.

QVMM

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 14.47%
• 6M: 14.87%
• 1Y: 26.39%
• 3Y*: 16.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RWK

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 4.38%
• YTD: 13.47%
• 6M: 12.75%
• 1Y: 28.13%
• 3Y*: 18.05%
• 5Y*: 10.64%
• 10Y*: 12.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVMM vs. RWK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF	14.47%	8.82%	13.36%	15.43%	-13.06%	6.04%
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	13.47%	10.27%	11.94%	23.76%	-8.19%	7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between QVMM and RWK is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.97

The correlation between QVMM and RWK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVMM vs. RWK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QVMM	RWK
Industrials	26.5%	21.8%
Financial Services	15.2%	13.1%
Technology	13.8%	14.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	20.7%
Healthcare	8.7%	4.0%
Real Estate	7.6%	2.8%
Energy	5.5%	5.3%
Basic Materials	4.7%	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	11.3%
Utilities	3.3%	1.6%
Communication Services	0.9%	0.7%

Return for Risk

QVMM vs. RWK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVMM

QVMM Risk / Return Rank: 56
QVMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QVMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
QVMM Omega Ratio Rank: 49
QVMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QVMM Martin Ratio Rank: 64

RWK

RWK Risk / Return Rank: 49
RWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
RWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
RWK Omega Ratio Rank: 46
RWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
RWK Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVMM vs. RWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QVMM	RWK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.70	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	2.54	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.29	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	2.54	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.48	8.15	+3.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QVMM vs. RWK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the RWK Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVMM and RWK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QVMM	RWK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	1.70	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.48	-0.03

Drawdowns

QVMM vs. RWK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVMM drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum RWK drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMM and RWK.

Drawdown Indicators

	QVMM	RWK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.00%	-56.49%	+32.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.30%	-11.14%	+2.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.00%	-24.58%	+0.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.23%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.09%	-7.55%	+0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	3.46%	-1.16%

Volatility

QVMM vs. RWK - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QVMM	RWK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	4.70%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.21%	11.86%	-0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.28%	16.70%	-1.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.48%	21.13%	-1.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.48%	22.95%	-3.47%

QVMM vs. RWK - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVMM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RWK's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

QVMM vs. RWK - Dividend Comparison

QVMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than RWK's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF	1.16%	1.32%	1.29%	1.42%	1.51%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	1.12%	1.25%	1.11%	1.05%	1.18%	0.85%	0.96%	1.09%	1.22%	0.99%	1.30%	0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QVMM and RWK in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, QVMM and RWK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QVMM or RWK?

RWK has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to QVMM (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMM dropped -24.00% vs RWK's -56.49%.

Which ETF is better, QVMM or RWK?

On 3-year performance, RWK leads with 18.05% vs 16.65% for QVMM. On fees, QVMM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QVMM or RWK?

Over the 3-year period, RWK has performed better with a 18.05% return vs 16.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QVMM or RWK?

QVMM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QVMM or RWK?

QVMM has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 1.12% for RWK.

What is the main difference between QVMM and RWK?

QVMM is categorized as Multi-factor, while RWK is Small Cap Blend Equities. QVMM tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while RWK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QVMM and 0.39% for RWK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QVMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.