QVMM vs. QQQM
QVMM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVMM is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QVMM returned 16.65%/yr vs 28.89%/yr for QQQM. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
QVMM vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVMM achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
QVMM
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 6M
- 14.87%
- 1Y
- 26.39%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
QVMM vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 14.47% | 8.82% | 13.36% | 15.43% | -13.06% | 6.04% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 12.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMM and QQQM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.71 |
The correlation between QVMM and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
QVMM vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QVMM
QQQM
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
QVMM
QQQM
Financial Services
QVMM
QQQM
Technology
QVMM
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
QVMM
QQQM
Healthcare
QVMM
QQQM
Real Estate
QVMM
QQQM
Energy
QVMM
QQQM
Basic Materials
QVMM
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
QVMM
QQQM
Utilities
QVMM
QQQM
Communication Services
QVMM
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVMM vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
QVMM
QQQM
QVMM vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVMM | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 2.65 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 3.46 | -0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.45 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 3.53 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.48 | 13.52 | -2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVMM | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.65 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.85 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
QVMM vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMM drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMM and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVMM | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.00% | -35.04% | +11.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -11.96% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.00% | -22.70% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.20% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -8.25% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 3.11% | -0.81% |
Volatility
QVMM vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVMM | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 4.48% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.21% | 12.05% | -0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 15.91% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 22.24% | -2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 22.12% | -2.64% |
QVMM vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QVMM and QQQM have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QVMM vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
QVMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 1.16% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVMM and QQQM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QVMM has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMM dropped -24.00% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 3-year performance, QQQM leads with 28.89% vs 16.65% for QVMM. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 28.89% return vs 16.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVMM and QQQM have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
QVMM has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
QVMM is categorized as Multi-factor, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. QVMM tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVMM and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer