PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVAL vs. VOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVAL vs. VOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly higher than VOE's 10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, QVAL has outperformed VOE with an annualized return of 11.64%, while VOE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.55% annualized return.


QVAL

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.34%
YTD
14.68%
6M
15.27%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
11.64%

VOE

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.35%
YTD
10.75%
6M
11.62%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVAL vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
14.68%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%34.40%-5.93%24.06%-17.28%25.59%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
10.75%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-12.48%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between QVAL and VOE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.85

The correlation between QVAL and VOE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVAL vs. VOE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVAL
VOE

Consumer Cyclical

32.4%
5.7%

Technology

16.7%
10.9%

Industrials

15.0%
14.0%

Healthcare

11.1%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
7.9%

Basic Materials

7.6%
5.8%

Energy

5.5%
12.8%

Communication Services

3.8%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.0%
6.0%

Financial Services

-

16.5%

Utilities

-

12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QVAL
32.4%
VOE
5.7%

Technology

QVAL
16.7%
VOE
10.9%

Industrials

QVAL
15.0%
VOE
14.0%

Healthcare

QVAL
11.1%
VOE
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

QVAL
7.9%
VOE
7.9%

Basic Materials

QVAL
7.6%
VOE
5.8%

Energy

QVAL
5.5%
VOE
12.8%

Communication Services

QVAL
3.8%
VOE
2.2%

Real Estate

QVAL
2.0%
VOE
6.0%

Financial Services

QVAL

-

VOE
16.5%

Utilities

QVAL

-

VOE
12.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVAL vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVAL vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVALVOEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

1.99

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.21

2.88

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

3.30

+1.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.98

12.51

+1.47

QVAL vs. VOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the VOE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVAL and VOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVALVOEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.99

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.53

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.56

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.44

+0.05

Drawdowns

QVAL vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, smaller than the maximum VOE drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and VOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVALVOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.49%

-61.50%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

-6.93%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-18.45%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-19.70%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

-43.18%

-8.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.16%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-8.35%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.82%

+0.31%

Volatility

QVAL vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) at 2.58%. This indicates that QVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVALVOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

2.58%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

8.13%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

11.47%

+2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.63%

16.03%

+5.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

18.83%

+3.96%

QVAL vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VOE's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVAL vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison

QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than VOE's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.46%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%0.00%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.88%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVAL and VOE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QVAL has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to VOE (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs VOE's -61.50%.

On 10-year performance, QVAL leads with 11.64% vs 10.55% for VOE. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QVAL has performed better with a 11.64% return vs 10.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QVAL.

VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.46% for QVAL.

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.07% for VOE.

QVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVAL and VOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer