PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVAL vs. SLYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVAL vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 16.06% return, which is significantly lower than SLYV's 21.12% return. Over the past 10 years, QVAL has outperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 12.39%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.18% annualized return.


QVAL

1D
0.70%
1M
0.41%
YTD
16.06%
6M
14.13%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
12.39%

SLYV

1D
0.88%
1M
4.24%
YTD
21.12%
6M
18.94%
1Y
39.10%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVAL vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
16.06%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%34.40%-5.93%24.06%-17.28%25.59%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
21.12%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between QVAL and SLYV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.85

The correlation between QVAL and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVAL vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVAL
SLYV

Consumer Cyclical

23.8%
15.4%

Energy

16.1%
7.0%

Industrials

14.1%
11.6%

Healthcare

13.9%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

9.8%
3.8%

Technology

8.3%
13.4%

Communication Services

6.0%
4.4%

Basic Materials

6.0%
6.9%

Utilities

2.0%
2.1%

Real Estate

2.0%
8.6%

Financial Services

-

19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QVAL
23.8%
SLYV
15.4%

Energy

QVAL
16.1%
SLYV
7.0%

Industrials

QVAL
14.1%
SLYV
11.6%

Healthcare

QVAL
13.9%
SLYV
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

QVAL
9.8%
SLYV
3.8%

Technology

QVAL
8.3%
SLYV
13.4%

Communication Services

QVAL
6.0%
SLYV
4.4%

Basic Materials

QVAL
6.0%
SLYV
6.9%

Utilities

QVAL
2.0%
SLYV
2.1%

Real Estate

QVAL
2.0%
SLYV
8.6%

Financial Services

QVAL

-

SLYV
19.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVAL vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVAL vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QVALSLYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

4.25

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.99

14.09

-0.10

QVAL vs. SLYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the SLYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVAL and SLYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QVAL vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, smaller than the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and SLYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVALSLYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.49%

-61.15%

+9.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

-9.36%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-28.68%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-28.68%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

-47.73%

-3.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

0.00%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

-8.92%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

2.82%

-0.66%

Volatility

QVAL vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) is 3.76%, while SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that QVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVALSLYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

4.83%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

11.82%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

18.26%

-3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.64%

21.90%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.74%

23.92%

-1.18%

QVAL vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVAL vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison

QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than SLYV's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.14%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%0.00%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.81%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVAL and SLYV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLYV has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to QVAL (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs SLYV's -61.15%.

On 10-year performance, QVAL leads with 12.39% vs 11.18% for SLYV. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QVAL has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QVAL.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.14% for QVAL.

QVAL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.15% for SLYV.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVAL and SLYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer