PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVAL vs. RDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVAL vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly higher than RDIV's 11.95% return. Over the past 10 years, QVAL has outperformed RDIV with an annualized return of 11.64%, while RDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.95% annualized return.


QVAL

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.34%
YTD
14.68%
6M
15.27%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
11.64%

RDIV

1D
-1.30%
1M
2.29%
YTD
11.95%
6M
11.03%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
10.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVAL vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
14.68%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%34.40%-5.93%24.06%-17.28%25.59%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
11.95%12.36%15.17%4.66%7.16%29.12%-9.31%22.62%-4.78%11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between QVAL and RDIV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.77

The correlation between QVAL and RDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVAL vs. RDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVAL
RDIV

Consumer Cyclical

32.4%
9.5%

Technology

16.7%
5.1%

Industrials

15.0%

-

Healthcare

11.1%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
15.9%

Basic Materials

7.6%
0.5%

Energy

5.5%
28.8%

Communication Services

3.8%

-

Real Estate

2.0%
8.0%

Financial Services

-

18.0%

Utilities

-

6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QVAL
32.4%
RDIV
9.5%

Technology

QVAL
16.7%
RDIV
5.1%

Industrials

QVAL
15.0%
RDIV

-

Healthcare

QVAL
11.1%
RDIV
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

QVAL
7.9%
RDIV
15.9%

Basic Materials

QVAL
7.6%
RDIV
0.5%

Energy

QVAL
5.5%
RDIV
28.8%

Communication Services

QVAL
3.8%
RDIV

-

Real Estate

QVAL
2.0%
RDIV
8.0%

Financial Services

QVAL

-

RDIV
18.0%

Utilities

QVAL

-

RDIV
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVAL vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVAL vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVALRDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

5.61

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.98

16.50

-2.52

QVAL vs. RDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the RDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVAL and RDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVALRDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.06

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.58

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.50

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.55

-0.06

Drawdowns

QVAL vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, roughly equal to the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and RDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVALRDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.49%

-49.97%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

-4.84%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-17.91%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-24.89%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

-49.97%

-1.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-1.65%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-5.86%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.65%

+0.48%

Volatility

QVAL vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) at 3.46%. This indicates that QVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVALRDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.46%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

8.62%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

13.23%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.63%

17.53%

+4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

21.89%

+0.90%

QVAL vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVAL vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison

QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than RDIV's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.46%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%0.00%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.66%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVAL and RDIV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QVAL has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to RDIV (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs RDIV's -49.97%.

On 10-year performance, QVAL leads with 11.64% vs 10.95% for RDIV. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, RDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QVAL has performed better with a 11.64% return vs 10.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 1.46% for QVAL.

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.39% for RDIV.

QVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVAL and RDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer