PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVAL vs. IVOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVAL vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly higher than IVOV's 8.98% return. Over the past 10 years, QVAL has outperformed IVOV with an annualized return of 11.64%, while IVOV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.41% annualized return.


QVAL

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.34%
YTD
14.68%
6M
15.27%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
11.64%

IVOV

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.86%
YTD
8.98%
6M
9.21%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVAL vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
14.68%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%34.40%-5.93%24.06%-17.28%25.59%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
8.98%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between QVAL and IVOV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.87

The correlation between QVAL and IVOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVAL vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVAL
IVOV

Consumer Cyclical

32.4%
13.5%

Technology

16.7%
9.2%

Industrials

15.0%
18.8%

Healthcare

11.1%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
5.5%

Basic Materials

7.6%
6.0%

Energy

5.5%
7.4%

Communication Services

3.8%
0.5%

Real Estate

2.0%
9.6%

Financial Services

-

21.9%

Utilities

-

4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QVAL
32.4%
IVOV
13.5%

Technology

QVAL
16.7%
IVOV
9.2%

Industrials

QVAL
15.0%
IVOV
18.8%

Healthcare

QVAL
11.1%
IVOV
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

QVAL
7.9%
IVOV
5.5%

Basic Materials

QVAL
7.6%
IVOV
6.0%

Energy

QVAL
5.5%
IVOV
7.4%

Communication Services

QVAL
3.8%
IVOV
0.5%

Real Estate

QVAL
2.0%
IVOV
9.6%

Financial Services

QVAL

-

IVOV
21.9%

Utilities

QVAL

-

IVOV
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVAL vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVAL vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVALIVOVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

1.37

+0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.21

2.08

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

1.97

+2.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.98

6.80

+7.18

QVAL vs. IVOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the IVOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVAL and IVOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVALIVOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.37

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.39

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.48

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.58

-0.09

Drawdowns

QVAL vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, which is greater than IVOV's maximum drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and IVOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVALIVOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.49%

-45.99%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

-10.58%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-22.61%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-22.61%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

-45.99%

-5.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.31%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-5.43%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

3.07%

-0.94%

Volatility

QVAL vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) have volatilities of 4.16% and 4.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVALIVOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

4.07%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

10.61%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

15.27%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.63%

19.48%

+2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

21.73%

+1.06%

QVAL vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVAL vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison

QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than IVOV's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.67%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.46%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVAL and IVOV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QVAL has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to IVOV (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs IVOV's -45.99%.

On 10-year performance, QVAL leads with 11.64% vs 10.41% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QVAL has performed better with a 11.64% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QVAL.

IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.46% for QVAL.

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.10% for IVOV.

QVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVAL and IVOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer