QVAL vs. ITAN
QVAL (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF) and ITAN (Sparkline Intangible Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVAL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while ITAN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Sparkline Capital. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QVAL returned 21.66%/yr vs 23.37%/yr for ITAN. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QVAL charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for ITAN.
Performance
QVAL vs. ITAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QVAL having a 14.68% return and ITAN slightly lower at 14.61%.
QVAL
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 14.68%
- 6M
- 15.27%
- 1Y
- 29.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.64%
ITAN
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 7.43%
- YTD
- 14.61%
- 6M
- 16.38%
- 1Y
- 38.08%
- 3Y*
- 23.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QVAL vs. ITAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 14.68% | 10.98% | 12.21% | 28.40% | -11.80% | 9.76% |
ITAN Sparkline Intangible Value ETF | 14.61% | 20.46% | 17.76% | 34.58% | -24.33% | 6.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVAL and ITAN is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between QVAL and ITAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
QVAL vs. ITAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QVAL
ITAN
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
QVAL
ITAN
Technology
QVAL
ITAN
Industrials
QVAL
ITAN
Healthcare
QVAL
ITAN
Consumer Defensive
QVAL
ITAN
Basic Materials
QVAL
ITAN
Energy
QVAL
ITAN
Communication Services
QVAL
ITAN
Real Estate
QVAL
ITAN
Financial Services
QVAL
-
ITAN
Utilities
QVAL
-
ITAN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVAL vs. ITAN — Risk / Return Rank
QVAL
ITAN
QVAL vs. ITAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVAL | ITAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | 2.67 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.21 | 3.62 | -0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.45 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.93 | 4.24 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.98 | 16.36 | -2.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVAL | ITAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 2.67 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.65 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
QVAL vs. ITAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, which is greater than ITAN's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and ITAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVAL | ITAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.49% | -30.41% | -21.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.04% | -9.03% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -20.47% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -1.56% | +0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -7.62% | -0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.33% | -0.20% |
Volatility
QVAL vs. ITAN - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) have volatilities of 4.16% and 4.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVAL | ITAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 4.02% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | 10.42% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.44% | 14.36% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 19.05% | +2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 19.05% | +3.74% |
QVAL vs. ITAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than ITAN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVAL vs. ITAN - Dividend Comparison
QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than ITAN's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITAN Sparkline Intangible Value ETF | 1.00% | 0.94% | 1.14% | 1.01% | 0.57% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 1.46% | 1.44% | 1.72% | 1.76% | 2.00% | 1.23% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVAL and ITAN have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QVAL has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to ITAN (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs ITAN's -30.41%.
On 3-year performance, ITAN leads with 23.37% vs 21.66% for QVAL. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, ITAN has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ITAN has performed better with a 23.37% return vs 21.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ITAN.
QVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.00% for ITAN.
QVAL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while ITAN is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Sparkline Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.50% for ITAN.
ITAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVAL and ITAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer