PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVAL vs. ITAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVAL vs. ITAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly higher than ITAN's 16.15% return.


QVAL

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.77%
6M
14.38%
YTD
20.72%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
11.94%
ALL TIME*
11.53%

ITAN

1D
1.02%
1M
1.85%
6M
13.28%
YTD
16.15%
1Y
36.02%
3Y*
20.69%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.57M$914.52K$523.15K
$1.37M$1.75M$1.48M

QVAL vs. ITAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
20.72%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%9.44%
ITAN
Sparkline Intangible Value ETF
16.15%20.46%17.76%34.58%-24.33%6.99%

Correlation

The correlation between QVAL and ITAN is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021

0.77

The correlation between QVAL and ITAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVAL vs. ITAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVAL
ITAN

Consumer Cyclical

21.6%
13.0%

Energy

20.3%
0.7%

Healthcare

14.1%
18.5%

Industrials

12.3%
12.8%

Technology

10.0%
31.3%

Basic Materials

8.0%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
3.8%

Communication Services

5.8%
13.5%

Utilities

2.0%

-

Real Estate

2.0%
0.4%

Financial Services

-

4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QVAL
21.6%
ITAN
13.0%

Energy

QVAL
20.3%
ITAN
0.7%

Healthcare

QVAL
14.1%
ITAN
18.5%

Industrials

QVAL
12.3%
ITAN
12.8%

Technology

QVAL
10.0%
ITAN
31.3%

Basic Materials

QVAL
8.0%
ITAN
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

QVAL
5.9%
ITAN
3.8%

Communication Services

QVAL
5.8%
ITAN
13.5%

Utilities

QVAL
2.0%
ITAN

-

Real Estate

QVAL
2.0%
ITAN
0.4%

Financial Services

QVAL

-

ITAN
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVAL vs. ITAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ITAN
ITAN Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ITAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ITAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QVAL vs. ITAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QVALITANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.39

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.18

3.74

+2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.14

13.81

+5.33

QVAL vs. ITAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the ITAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVAL and ITAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QVAL vs. ITAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, which is greater than ITAN's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and ITAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVALITANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.49%

-30.41%

-21.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

-9.03%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-20.47%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-30.41%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-0.24%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

-7.45%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.44%

-0.49%

Volatility

QVAL vs. ITAN - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) have volatilities of 3.51% and 3.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVALITANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

3.67%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

10.86%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

14.74%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.56%

19.02%

+2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.70%

18.91%

+3.79%

QVAL vs. ITAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than ITAN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVAL vs. ITAN - Dividend Comparison

QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than ITAN's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ITAN
Sparkline Intangible Value ETF
1.03%0.94%1.14%1.01%0.57%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.42%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVAL and ITAN have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITAN has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to QVAL (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs ITAN's -30.41%.

On 5-year performance, QVAL leads with 12.93% vs 12.16% for ITAN. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, QVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QVAL has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 12.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ITAN.

QVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 1.03% for ITAN.

QVAL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while ITAN is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Sparkline. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.50% for ITAN.

QVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVAL and ITAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer