ITAN vs. SCHD
ITAN (Sparkline Intangible Value ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITAN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Sparkline Capital, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. ITAN is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ITAN returned 23.85%/yr vs 15.09%/yr for SCHD. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITAN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
ITAN vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITAN achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.
ITAN
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 8.25%
- YTD
- 15.94%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 23.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 20.36%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
ITAN vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITAN Sparkline Intangible Value ETF | 15.94% | 20.46% | 17.76% | 34.58% | -24.33% | 6.97% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITAN and SCHD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between ITAN and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITAN vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITAN
SCHD
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
ITAN
SCHD
Communication Services
ITAN
SCHD
Healthcare
ITAN
SCHD
Industrials
ITAN
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
ITAN
SCHD
Financial Services
ITAN
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
ITAN
SCHD
Basic Materials
ITAN
SCHD
Energy
ITAN
SCHD
Real Estate
ITAN
SCHD
-
Utilities
ITAN
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITAN vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
ITAN
SCHD
ITAN vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITAN | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.87 | 2.57 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.88 | 3.98 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.46 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.50 | 6.17 | -1.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.43 | 15.20 | +2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITAN | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 2.57 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.86 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
ITAN vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITAN drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITAN and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITAN | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.41% | -33.37% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -4.61% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.47% | -16.13% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -1.40% | +0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.62% | -3.32% | -4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 1.87% | +0.46% |
Volatility
ITAN vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.92%. This indicates that ITAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITAN | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 2.92% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 7.66% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.30% | 10.96% | +3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 14.38% | +4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 16.72% | +2.33% |
ITAN vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITAN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITAN vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
ITAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITAN Sparkline Intangible Value ETF | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.14% | 1.01% | 0.57% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITAN and SCHD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITAN has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to SCHD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITAN dropped -30.41% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 3-year performance, ITAN leads with 23.85% vs 15.09% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ITAN has performed better with a 23.85% return vs 15.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ITAN.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.99% for ITAN.
ITAN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Sparkline Capital and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ITAN and 0.06% for SCHD.
ITAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITAN and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer