PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUBT vs. CDNS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QUBT vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUBT achieves a -3.22% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's 23.16% return.


QUBT

1D
0.20%
1M
-5.47%
YTD
-3.22%
6M
-17.59%
1Y
-40.47%
3Y*
77.69%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*

CDNS

1D
0.32%
1M
10.86%
YTD
23.16%
6M
19.10%
1Y
28.32%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
24.39%
10Y*
31.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUBT vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QUBT
Quantum Computing, Inc.
-3.22%-38.01%1,712.51%-39.53%-55.72%-75.83%370.33%0.00%-42.31%
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
23.16%4.03%10.31%69.55%-13.80%36.59%96.70%59.52%-1.38%

Correlation

The correlation between QUBT and CDNS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2018

0.19

The correlation between QUBT and CDNS shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QUBT:

$2.22B

CDNS:

$105.37B

EPS

QUBT:

-$0.21

CDNS:

$4.28

PS Ratio

QUBT:

428.61

CDNS:

19.03

PB Ratio

QUBT:

1.39

CDNS:

12.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

QUBT:

$4.33M

CDNS:

$5.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QUBT:

-$667.00K

CDNS:

$4.91B

EBITDA (TTM)

QUBT:

-$52.52M

CDNS:

$1.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUBT vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUBT
QUBT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QUBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUBT Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
QUBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

CDNS
CDNS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CDNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDNS Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CDNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDNS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUBT vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QUBTCDNSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.15

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

0.87

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

1.84

-2.73

QUBT vs. CDNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUBT Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUBT and CDNS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUBT vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUBT drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, roughly equal to the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBT and CDNS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUBTCDNSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.53%

-93.13%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.37%

-28.85%

-45.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.40%

-29.05%

-53.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.63%

-29.59%

-66.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.33%

-7.55%

-53.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.90%

-39.62%

-33.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.67%

13.63%

+35.04%

Volatility

QUBT vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) has a higher volatility of 33.55% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 16.52%. This indicates that QUBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUBTCDNSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.55%

16.52%

+17.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.37%

31.73%

+35.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

103.81%

38.94%

+64.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

133.05%

36.17%

+96.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

177.48%

34.12%

+143.36%

Dividends

QUBT vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

Neither QUBT nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

QUBT vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quantum Computing, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
3.69M
1.47B
(QUBT) Total Revenue
(CDNS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


QUBT and CDNS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUBT has higher volatility (33.55%) compared to CDNS (16.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUBT dropped -97.53% vs CDNS's -93.13%.

CDNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUBT and CDNS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer