CDNS vs. APH

In the year-to-date period, CDNS achieves a 6.37% return, which is significantly lower than APH's 43.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CDNS has outperformed APH with an annualized return of 31.90%, while APH has yielded a comparatively lower 19.79% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CDNS Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the APH Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDNS and APH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.

The maximum CDNS drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, which is greater than APH's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNS and APH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a higher volatility of 15.53% compared to Amphenol Corporation (APH) at 7.42%. This indicates that CDNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.