CDNS vs. APH
Compare and contrast key facts about Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Amphenol Corporation (APH).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CDNS or APH.
Correlation
The correlation between CDNS and APH is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CDNS vs. APH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CDNS:
0.32
APH:
1.76
CDNS:
0.71
APH:
2.12
CDNS:
1.09
APH:
1.32
CDNS:
0.45
APH:
2.75
CDNS:
0.94
APH:
8.63
CDNS:
11.65%
APH:
5.43%
CDNS:
34.61%
APH:
26.71%
CDNS:
-93.13%
APH:
-63.41%
CDNS:
-6.40%
APH:
-7.67%
Fundamentals
CDNS:
$83.81B
APH:
$84.22B
CDNS:
$3.80
APH:
$1.74
CDNS:
80.42
APH:
39.90
CDNS:
3.16
APH:
2.14
CDNS:
$3.29B
APH:
$10.90B
CDNS:
$2.96B
APH:
$3.66B
CDNS:
$1.12B
APH:
$2.68B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDNS achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly higher than APH's -0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CDNS has outperformed APH with an annualized return of 32.58%, while APH has yielded a comparatively lower 19.00% annualized return.
CDNS
1.71%
1.91%
9.16%
4.61%
32.98%
32.58%
APH
-0.04%
-0.84%
8.40%
43.44%
21.71%
19.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CDNS vs. APH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CDNS
APH
CDNS vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CDNS vs. APH - Dividend Comparison
CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.79% | 0.79% | 0.86% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
CDNS vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDNS drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, which is greater than APH's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNS and APH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CDNS vs. APH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) is 6.92%, while Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that CDNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CDNS vs. APH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities