PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUBT vs. SQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QUBT vs. SQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUBT achieves a 9.16% return, which is significantly lower than SQM's 15.51% return.


QUBT

1D
-8.57%
1M
17.89%
YTD
9.16%
6M
-7.21%
1Y
-9.68%
3Y*
109.96%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*

SQM

1D
-2.80%
1M
-11.45%
YTD
15.51%
6M
26.25%
1Y
158.32%
3Y*
6.55%
5Y*
16.20%
10Y*
17.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUBT vs. SQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QUBT
Quantum Computing, Inc.
9.16%-38.01%1,712.51%-39.53%-55.72%-75.83%370.33%0.00%-42.31%
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
15.51%89.55%-39.35%-18.47%71.62%6.82%89.19%-27.30%-17.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QUBT and SQM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QUBT:

$2.51B

SQM:

$22.39B

EPS

QUBT:

-$0.21

SQM:

$2.86

PS Ratio

QUBT:

483.43

SQM:

4.22

PB Ratio

QUBT:

1.57

SQM:

3.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

QUBT:

$4.33M

SQM:

$5.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QUBT:

-$667.00K

SQM:

$1.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

QUBT:

-$52.52M

SQM:

$1.75B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUBT vs. SQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUBT
QUBT Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
QUBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUBT Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
QUBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUBT Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SQM
SQM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUBT vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QUBTSQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.09

3.16

-3.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.71

3.47

-2.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.42

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

8.18

-8.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.20

21.01

-21.21

QUBT vs. SQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUBT Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the SQM Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUBT and SQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QUBTSQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

3.16

-3.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.33

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.42

-0.36

Drawdowns

QUBT vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUBT drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, which is greater than SQM's maximum drawdown of -78.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBT and SQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUBTSQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.53%

-78.34%

-19.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.37%

-19.47%

-54.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.40%

-61.32%

-21.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.63%

-69.76%

-25.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.39%

-19.84%

-36.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.99%

-30.33%

-42.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.68%

7.57%

+40.11%

Volatility

QUBT vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison

Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) has a higher volatility of 36.08% compared to Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) at 11.83%. This indicates that QUBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUBTSQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.08%

11.83%

+24.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.55%

35.12%

+32.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.57%

50.42%

+57.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

133.11%

49.65%

+83.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

177.77%

46.05%

+131.72%

Dividends

QUBT vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison

QUBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QUBT
Quantum Computing, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
1.47%0.18%0.59%8.34%9.66%3.92%1.64%4.55%5.37%2.73%4.77%2.00%

Financials

QUBT vs. SQM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quantum Computing, Inc. and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
3.69M
1.76B
(QUBT) Total Revenue
(SQM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


QUBT and SQM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUBT has higher volatility (36.08%) compared to SQM (11.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUBT dropped -97.53% vs SQM's -78.34%.

SQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUBT and SQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer