QUBT vs. SQM
QUBT (Quantum Computing, Inc.) and SQM (Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.) are both stocks. QUBT operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while SQM operates in Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, QUBT returned 7.01%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for SQM. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QUBT vs. SQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUBT achieves a -22.03% return, which is significantly lower than SQM's 5.75% return.
QUBT
- 1D
- -7.62%
- 1M
- -19.44%
- 6M
- -33.94%
- YTD
- -22.03%
- 1Y
- -54.10%
- 3Y*
- 84.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- —
SQM
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -14.48%
- 6M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 1Y
- 93.69%
- 3Y*
- -1.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.60%
- 10Y*
- 15.31%
QUBT vs. SQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | -22.03% | -38.01% | 1,712.51% | -39.53% | -55.72% | -75.83% | 370.33% | 0.00% | -42.31% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 5.75% | 89.55% | -39.35% | -18.47% | 71.62% | 6.82% | 89.19% | -27.30% | -19.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUBT and SQM is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2018 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
QUBT:
$1.09B
SQM:
$20.55B
QUBT:
-$0.20
SQM:
$2.86
QUBT:
373.41
SQM:
3.87
QUBT:
1.12
SQM:
3.50
QUBT:
$4.33M
SQM:
$5.31B
QUBT:
-$667.00K
SQM:
$1.83B
QUBT:
-$52.52M
SQM:
$1.75B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUBT vs. SQM — Risk / Return Rank
QUBT
SQM
QUBT vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUBT | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.29 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 3.60 | -4.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 9.49 | -10.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUBT vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUBT drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, which is greater than SQM's maximum drawdown of -78.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBT and SQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUBT | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.53% | -78.34% | -19.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.37% | -26.18% | -48.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.40% | -61.32% | -21.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.63% | -69.76% | -25.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.85% | -26.61% | -42.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.80% | -30.30% | -42.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.96% | 9.91% | +41.05% |
Volatility
QUBT vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison
Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) has a higher volatility of 27.06% compared to Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) at 13.74%. This indicates that QUBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUBT | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.06% | 13.74% | +13.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.66% | 36.60% | +31.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.87% | 51.07% | +49.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 133.48% | 49.82% | +83.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 176.86% | 46.16% | +130.70% |
Dividends
QUBT vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison
QUBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 1.60% | 0.18% | 0.59% | 8.34% | 9.66% | 3.92% | 1.64% | 4.55% | 5.37% | 2.73% | 4.77% | 2.00% |
Financials
QUBT vs. SQM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quantum Computing, Inc. and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
QUBT and SQM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUBT has higher volatility (27.06%) compared to SQM (13.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUBT dropped -97.53% vs SQM's -78.34%.
SQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUBT and SQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer