QUBT vs. QBTS
QUBT (Quantum Computing, Inc.) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Computer Hardware industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, QUBT returned 99.87%/yr vs 146.69%/yr for QBTS. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
QUBT vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUBT achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly higher than QBTS's -6.42% return.
QUBT
- 1D
- -2.04%
- 1M
- -14.38%
- YTD
- 2.73%
- 6M
- -14.24%
- 1Y
- -44.17%
- 3Y*
- 99.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.10%
- 10Y*
- —
QBTS
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -16.77%
- YTD
- -6.42%
- 6M
- -23.98%
- 1Y
- 56.36%
- 3Y*
- 146.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUBT vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | 2.73% | -38.01% | 1,712.51% | -39.53% | -58.40% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -6.42% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUBT and QBTS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, QUBT and QBTS have become more correlated (0.82) than their long-term average of 0.55, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
QUBT:
$2.36B
QBTS:
$8.99B
QUBT:
-$0.21
QBTS:
-$1.08
QUBT:
454.94
QBTS:
667.11
QUBT:
1.48
QBTS:
8.00
QUBT:
$4.33M
QBTS:
$12.44M
QUBT:
-$667.00K
QBTS:
$8.25M
QUBT:
-$52.52M
QBTS:
-$399.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUBT vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank
QUBT
QBTS
QUBT vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUBT | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.17 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 0.80 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 1.37 | -2.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUBT vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUBT drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, roughly equal to the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBT and QBTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUBT | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.53% | -96.67% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.37% | -71.01% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.40% | -79.17% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.96% | -45.36% | -13.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.86% | -65.55% | -7.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.24% | 41.13% | +8.11% |
Volatility
QUBT vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) is 34.46%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 43.79%. This indicates that QUBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUBT | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.46% | 43.79% | -9.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.92% | 77.15% | -9.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.34% | 109.72% | -8.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 133.24% | 150.86% | -17.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 177.37% | 150.86% | +26.51% |
Dividends
QUBT vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison
Neither QUBT nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
QUBT vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quantum Computing, Inc. and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
QUBT and QBTS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (43.79%) compared to QUBT (34.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUBT dropped -97.53% vs QBTS's -96.67%.
QBTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUBT and QBTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer