PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDNS vs. LSCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CDNS vs. LSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDNS achieves a 24.46% return, which is significantly lower than LSCC's 111.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CDNS has underperformed LSCC with an annualized return of 32.24%, while LSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 39.89% annualized return.


CDNS

1D
0.43%
1M
4.14%
YTD
24.46%
6M
22.51%
1Y
31.70%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
23.94%
10Y*
32.24%

LSCC

1D
1.01%
1M
8.41%
YTD
111.02%
6M
102.94%
1Y
207.95%
3Y*
22.08%
5Y*
23.97%
10Y*
39.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDNS vs. LSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
24.46%4.03%10.31%69.55%-13.80%36.59%96.70%59.52%3.97%65.82%
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
111.02%29.89%-17.89%6.33%-15.81%68.18%139.39%176.59%19.72%-21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CDNS and LSCC is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.40

The correlation between CDNS and LSCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CDNS:

$106.49B

LSCC:

$21.64B

EPS

CDNS:

$4.28

LSCC:

$0.14

PE Ratio

CDNS:

90.81

LSCC:

1.08K

PS Ratio

CDNS:

19.23

LSCC:

37.32

PB Ratio

CDNS:

12.21

LSCC:

29.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

CDNS:

$5.53B

LSCC:

$574.01M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CDNS:

$4.91B

LSCC:

$383.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

CDNS:

$1.87B

LSCC:

$65.23M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDNS vs. LSCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDNS
CDNS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CDNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDNS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CDNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDNS Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

LSCC
LSCC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDNS vs. LSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDNSLSCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.51

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

10.83

-9.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.33

31.28

-28.95

CDNS vs. LSCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDNS Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the LSCC Sharpe Ratio of 3.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDNS and LSCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDNS vs. LSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDNS drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, roughly equal to the maximum LSCC drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNS and LSCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDNSLSCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.13%

-97.34%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.85%

-19.33%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.05%

-61.09%

+32.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.59%

-61.09%

+31.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.12%

-61.09%

+28.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.57%

0.00%

-6.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.60%

-55.09%

+15.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.65%

6.68%

+6.97%

Volatility

CDNS vs. LSCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) is 16.06%, while Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a volatility of 21.11%. This indicates that CDNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDNSLSCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.06%

21.11%

-5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.51%

43.75%

-12.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.03%

55.88%

-16.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.20%

54.52%

-18.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.14%

50.80%

-16.66%

Dividends

CDNS vs. LSCC - Dividend Comparison

Neither CDNS nor LSCC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CDNS vs. LSCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
1.47B
170.90M
(CDNS) Total Revenue
(LSCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CDNS vs. LSCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
95.9%
68.8%
Portfolio components
CDNS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

LSCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 117.63M and revenue of 170.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.

CDNS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 431.33M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.

LSCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of 26.07M and revenue of 170.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

CDNS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 335.66M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.

LSCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of 21.82M and revenue of 170.90M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CDNS and LSCC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSCC has higher volatility (21.11%) compared to CDNS (16.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDNS dropped -93.13% vs LSCC's -97.34%.

LSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDNS and LSCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer