CDNS vs. LSCC

In the year-to-date period, CDNS achieves a 6.37% return, which is significantly higher than LSCC's -27.57% return. Over the past 10 years, CDNS has outperformed LSCC with an annualized return of 31.90%, while LSCC has yielded a comparatively lower 22.67% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CDNS Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the LSCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDNS and LSCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CDNS nor LSCC has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CDNS drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, roughly equal to the maximum LSCC drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNS and LSCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a higher volatility of 15.37% compared to Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) at 12.25%. This indicates that CDNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.