CDNS vs. LSCC
Compare and contrast key facts about Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC).
Performance
CDNS vs. LSCC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CDNS vs. LSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | -11.10% | 4.03% | 10.31% | 69.55% | -13.80% | 36.59% | 96.70% | 59.52% | 3.97% | 65.82% |
LSCC Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | 26.07% | 29.89% | -17.89% | 6.33% | -15.81% | 68.18% | 139.39% | 176.59% | 19.72% | -21.47% |
Fundamentals
CDNS:
$75.84B
LSCC:
$12.68B
CDNS:
$4.06
LSCC:
$0.02
CDNS:
68.49
LSCC:
4.13K
CDNS:
14.34
LSCC:
24.37
CDNS:
10.67
LSCC:
18.29
CDNS:
$5.30B
LSCC:
$523.26M
CDNS:
$5.09B
LSCC:
$356.94M
CDNS:
$1.74B
LSCC:
$45.55M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDNS achieves a -11.10% return, which is significantly lower than LSCC's 26.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CDNS has underperformed LSCC with an annualized return of 27.94%, while LSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 32.43% annualized return.
CDNS
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- -11.10%
- 6M
- -20.89%
- 1Y
- 9.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 14.45%
- 10Y*
- 27.94%
LSCC
- 1D
- 8.72%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- 26.07%
- 6M
- 26.51%
- 1Y
- 76.85%
- 3Y*
- -0.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.76%
- 10Y*
- 32.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDNS vs. LSCC — Risk / Return Rank
CDNS
LSCC
CDNS vs. LSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDNS | LSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 1.24 | -1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.63 | 1.97 | -1.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.27 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 2.38 | -2.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.65 | 7.14 | -6.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDNS | LSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 1.24 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.26 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.64 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.20 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between CDNS and LSCC is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CDNS vs. LSCC - Dividend Comparison
Neither CDNS nor LSCC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CDNS vs. LSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDNS drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, roughly equal to the maximum LSCC drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNS and LSCC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDNS | LSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.13% | -97.34% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.09% | -28.50% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.59% | -61.09% | +31.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.12% | -61.09% | +28.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.58% | -12.30% | -13.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.79% | -55.42% | +15.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.61% | 9.49% | +3.12% |
Volatility
CDNS vs. LSCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) is 7.46%, while Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a volatility of 22.11%. This indicates that CDNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CDNS | LSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.46% | 22.11% | -14.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.41% | 40.40% | -14.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.60% | 62.74% | -23.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.27% | 53.93% | -18.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.43% | 50.61% | -17.18% |
Financials
CDNS vs. LSCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities