PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CDNS vs. LSCC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CDNS and LSCC is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

CDNS vs. LSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

4,500.00%5,000.00%5,500.00%6,000.00%6,500.00%7,000.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6,733.33%
5,985.78%
CDNS
LSCC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CDNS:

0.32

LSCC:

-0.17

Sortino Ratio

CDNS:

0.71

LSCC:

0.13

Omega Ratio

CDNS:

1.09

LSCC:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

CDNS:

0.45

LSCC:

-0.15

Martin Ratio

CDNS:

0.94

LSCC:

-0.30

Ulcer Index

CDNS:

11.65%

LSCC:

29.07%

Daily Std Dev

CDNS:

34.61%

LSCC:

53.01%

Max Drawdown

CDNS:

-93.13%

LSCC:

-97.34%

Current Drawdown

CDNS:

-6.40%

LSCC:

-40.04%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CDNS:

$83.81B

LSCC:

$8.05B

EPS

CDNS:

$3.80

LSCC:

$1.06

PE Ratio

CDNS:

80.42

LSCC:

55.02

PEG Ratio

CDNS:

3.16

LSCC:

3.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

CDNS:

$3.29B

LSCC:

$391.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CDNS:

$2.96B

LSCC:

$250.26M

EBITDA (TTM)

CDNS:

$1.12B

LSCC:

$90.11M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDNS achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than LSCC's 2.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CDNS has outperformed LSCC with an annualized return of 32.58%, while LSCC has yielded a comparatively lower 24.14% annualized return.


CDNS

YTD

1.71%

1M

1.91%

6M

9.16%

1Y

4.61%

5Y*

32.98%

10Y*

32.58%

LSCC

YTD

2.95%

1M

-0.39%

6M

3.72%

1Y

-12.66%

5Y*

20.15%

10Y*

24.14%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CDNS vs. LSCC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDNS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CDNS is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CDNS is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CDNS is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CDNS is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CDNS is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CDNS is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

LSCC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LSCC is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LSCC is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LSCC is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LSCC is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LSCC is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LSCC is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CDNS vs. LSCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.32-0.17
The chart of Sortino ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.710.13
The chart of Omega ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.091.02
The chart of Calmar ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.45-0.15
The chart of Martin ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.000.94-0.30
CDNS
LSCC

The current CDNS Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the LSCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDNS and LSCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.32
-0.17
CDNS
LSCC

Dividends

CDNS vs. LSCC - Dividend Comparison

Neither CDNS nor LSCC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CDNS vs. LSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDNS drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, roughly equal to the maximum LSCC drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNS and LSCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-6.40%
-40.04%
CDNS
LSCC

Volatility

CDNS vs. LSCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) is 6.92%, while Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a volatility of 11.46%. This indicates that CDNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.92%
11.46%
CDNS
LSCC

Financials

CDNS vs. LSCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab