CDNS vs. STM
Compare and contrast key facts about Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM).
Performance
CDNS vs. STM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CDNS vs. STM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | -11.10% | 4.03% | 10.31% | 69.55% | -13.80% | 36.59% | 96.70% | 59.52% | 3.97% | 65.82% |
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 33.57% | 5.28% | -49.67% | 41.66% | -26.76% | 32.39% | 38.91% | 96.34% | -35.65% | 94.77% |
Fundamentals
CDNS:
$75.84B
STM:
$30.75B
CDNS:
$4.06
STM:
$0.28
CDNS:
68.49
STM:
123.52
CDNS:
14.34
STM:
2.63
CDNS:
10.67
STM:
1.72
CDNS:
$5.30B
STM:
$11.84B
CDNS:
$5.09B
STM:
$4.01B
CDNS:
$1.74B
STM:
$2.41B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDNS achieves a -11.10% return, which is significantly lower than STM's 33.57% return. Over the past 10 years, CDNS has outperformed STM with an annualized return of 27.94%, while STM has yielded a comparatively lower 21.41% annualized return.
CDNS
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- -11.10%
- 6M
- -20.89%
- 1Y
- 9.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 14.45%
- 10Y*
- 27.94%
STM
- 1D
- 10.31%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- 33.57%
- 6M
- 23.02%
- 1Y
- 59.31%
- 3Y*
- -12.68%
- 5Y*
- -1.74%
- 10Y*
- 21.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDNS vs. STM — Risk / Return Rank
CDNS
STM
CDNS vs. STM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CDNS | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 1.08 | -0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.63 | 1.73 | -1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.24 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 1.59 | -1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.65 | 3.60 | -2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CDNS | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 1.08 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | -0.04 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.49 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.20 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between CDNS and STM is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CDNS vs. STM - Dividend Comparison
CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.32% | 0.48% | 0.67% | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.89% | 1.73% | 0.98% | 2.10% | 5.11% |
Drawdowns
CDNS vs. STM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDNS drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, roughly equal to the maximum STM drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNS and STM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDNS | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.13% | -94.40% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.09% | -36.35% | +8.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.59% | -66.66% | +37.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.12% | -66.66% | +34.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.58% | -34.41% | +8.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.79% | -55.49% | +15.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.61% | 16.08% | -3.47% |
Volatility
CDNS vs. STM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) is 7.46%, while STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) has a volatility of 18.64%. This indicates that CDNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CDNS | STM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.46% | 18.64% | -11.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.41% | 35.35% | -9.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.60% | 55.35% | -15.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.27% | 43.15% | -7.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.43% | 43.64% | -10.21% |
Financials
CDNS vs. STM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities