CDNS vs. STM
Compare and contrast key facts about Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CDNS or STM.
Correlation
The correlation between CDNS and STM is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CDNS vs. STM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CDNS:
-0.50
STM:
-1.20
CDNS:
-0.50
STM:
-1.86
CDNS:
0.94
STM:
0.77
CDNS:
-0.66
STM:
-0.83
CDNS:
-1.35
STM:
-1.54
CDNS:
13.91%
STM:
34.30%
CDNS:
37.32%
STM:
43.97%
CDNS:
-93.13%
STM:
-94.40%
CDNS:
-23.76%
STM:
-63.38%
Fundamentals
CDNS:
$68.28B
STM:
$19.23B
CDNS:
$3.84
STM:
$1.66
CDNS:
64.82
STM:
11.77
CDNS:
2.79
STM:
1.67
CDNS:
$3.63B
STM:
$9.81B
CDNS:
$3.37B
STM:
$3.78B
CDNS:
$1.28B
STM:
$2.49B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDNS achieves a -17.16% return, which is significantly higher than STM's -21.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CDNS has outperformed STM with an annualized return of 29.78%, while STM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.16% annualized return.
CDNS
-17.16%
3.16%
-6.35%
-19.86%
31.35%
29.78%
STM
-21.50%
-17.95%
-30.34%
-53.50%
1.06%
9.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CDNS vs. STM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CDNS
STM
CDNS vs. STM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CDNS vs. STM - Dividend Comparison
CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 1.84% | 1.32% | 0.48% | 0.82% | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.86% | 1.47% | 0.93% | 2.10% | 5.11% | 4.55% |
Drawdowns
CDNS vs. STM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDNS drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, roughly equal to the maximum STM drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNS and STM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CDNS vs. STM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) is 10.43%, while STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) has a volatility of 15.23%. This indicates that CDNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CDNS vs. STM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities