PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUASX vs. ISCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUASX vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUASX achieves a 19.36% return, which is significantly higher than ISCG's 13.25% return. Over the past 10 years, QUASX has outperformed ISCG with an annualized return of 14.85%, while ISCG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.60% annualized return.


QUASX

1D
-1.63%
1M
5.72%
YTD
19.36%
6M
21.07%
1Y
33.25%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
2.50%
10Y*
14.85%

ISCG

1D
-0.85%
1M
4.48%
YTD
13.25%
6M
13.97%
1Y
31.45%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUASX vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QUASX
AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio
19.36%4.85%18.49%17.83%-39.09%9.76%53.85%49.85%-1.02%34.71%
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
13.25%12.88%13.35%23.13%-26.75%-1.26%43.41%27.66%-6.91%24.68%

Correlation

The correlation between QUASX and ISCG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2004

0.94

The correlation between QUASX and ISCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUASX vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUASX
QUASX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
QUASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUASX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
QUASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUASX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCG
ISCG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ISCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUASX vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QUASXISCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.76

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

10.52

-2.74

QUASX vs. ISCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the ISCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUASX and ISCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUASX vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUASX drawdown since its inception was -60.97%, which is greater than ISCG's maximum drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUASX and ISCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUASXISCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.97%

-57.72%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.02%

-11.43%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.68%

-26.71%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.37%

-37.80%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.37%

-41.48%

-5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-1.71%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-11.61%

-4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

3.00%

+1.09%

Volatility

QUASX vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison

AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) at 6.10%. This indicates that QUASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUASXISCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

6.10%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.24%

13.61%

+5.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.45%

18.54%

+5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.47%

23.03%

+3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.62%

23.19%

+2.43%

QUASX vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUASX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

QUASX vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison

QUASX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.59%0.61%0.84%0.77%0.92%0.62%0.10%0.27%0.40%0.52%1.19%0.64%
QUASX
AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.07%9.86%18.20%19.70%9.29%2.32%9.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, QUASX and ISCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QUASX has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to ISCG (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUASX dropped -60.97% vs ISCG's -57.72%.

ISCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUASX and ISCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer