QUASX vs. ISCG
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG).
QUASX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Feb 12, 1969. ISCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004.
Performance
QUASX vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QUASX vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | -7.77% | 4.85% | 18.49% | 17.83% | -39.09% | 9.76% | 53.85% | 49.85% | -1.02% | 34.71% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | -1.05% | 12.88% | 13.35% | 23.13% | -26.75% | -1.26% | 43.41% | 27.66% | -6.91% | 24.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUASX achieves a -7.77% return, which is significantly lower than ISCG's -1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, QUASX has outperformed ISCG with an annualized return of 12.29%, while ISCG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.56% annualized return.
QUASX
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -9.96%
- YTD
- -7.77%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- 12.87%
- 3Y*
- 7.13%
- 5Y*
- -2.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.29%
ISCG
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 22.45%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QUASX vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUASX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QUASX vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank
QUASX
ISCG
QUASX vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QUASX | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | 0.97 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.77 | 1.50 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.20 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 1.58 | -0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.04 | 6.35 | -4.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QUASX | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 0.97 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.10 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.46 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.38 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between QUASX and ISCG is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QUASX vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison
QUASX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.07% | 9.86% | 18.20% | 19.70% | 9.29% | 2.32% | 9.19% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.64% | 0.61% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.10% | 0.27% | 0.40% | 0.52% | 1.19% | 0.64% |
Drawdowns
QUASX vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUASX drawdown since its inception was -60.97%, which is greater than ISCG's maximum drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUASX and ISCG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUASX | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.97% | -57.72% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.10% | -14.09% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.37% | -37.80% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.37% | -41.48% | -5.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.06% | -8.39% | -16.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.78% | -11.71% | -4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 3.50% | +0.87% |
Volatility
QUASX vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison
AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) has a higher volatility of 9.91% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) at 7.39%. This indicates that QUASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QUASX | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.91% | 7.39% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.36% | 14.01% | +4.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.66% | 23.33% | +4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.19% | 22.98% | +3.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.39% | 23.12% | +2.27% |