QUASX vs. FCPGX
QUASX (AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio) and FCPGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, QUASX returned 13.22%/yr vs 14.13%/yr for FCPGX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. QUASX charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FCPGX.
Performance
QUASX vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUASX achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 17.96% return. Over the past 10 years, QUASX has underperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of 13.22%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.13% annualized return.
QUASX
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- -12.02%
- 6M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 10.78%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.73%
FCPGX
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -7.58%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- YTD
- 17.96%
- 1Y
- 29.43%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
QUASX vs. FCPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | 10.78% | 4.85% | 18.49% | 17.83% | -39.09% | 9.76% | 53.85% | 49.85% | -1.02% | 34.71% |
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund | 17.96% | 11.20% | 20.56% | 19.02% | -25.34% | 10.50% | 36.41% | 36.31% | -4.57% | 28.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUASX and FCPGX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004 | 0.96 |
The correlation between QUASX and FCPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUASX vs. FCPGX — Risk / Return Rank
QUASX
FCPGX
QUASX vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUASX | FCPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.23 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 2.30 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.85 | 8.64 | -4.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUASX vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUASX drawdown since its inception was -60.97%, roughly equal to the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUASX and FCPGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUASX | FCPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.97% | -59.11% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.02% | -13.12% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.68% | -28.69% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.37% | -39.04% | -8.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.37% | -39.04% | -8.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.02% | -7.58% | -4.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.70% | -10.64% | -5.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 3.49% | +0.98% |
Volatility
QUASX vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison
AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) at 5.50%. This indicates that QUASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUASX | FCPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 5.50% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.24% | 17.80% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.32% | 22.58% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.61% | 23.70% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.62% | 22.93% | +2.69% |
QUASX vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUASX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FCPGX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
QUASX vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison
QUASX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund | 5.41% | 6.38% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 19.27% | 8.19% | 5.31% | 14.35% | 6.88% | 1.53% | 4.32% |
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.07% | 9.86% | 18.20% | 19.70% | 9.29% | 2.32% | 9.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, QUASX and FCPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QUASX has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to FCPGX (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUASX dropped -60.97% vs FCPGX's -59.11%.
FCPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUASX and FCPGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer