QUASX vs. FCPGX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX).
QUASX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Feb 12, 1969. FCPGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QUASX or FCPGX.
Key characteristics
| QUASX | FCPGX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 26.35% | 29.08% |
| 1Y Return | 49.01% | 52.28% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -8.42% | 0.35% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.26% | 6.86% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.24% | 7.98% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.36 | 2.64 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.18 | 3.50 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.39 | 1.44 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.02 | 1.29 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.34 | 16.16 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.76% | 3.25% |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.30% | 19.88% |
| Max Drawdown | -81.67% | -59.11% |
| Current Drawdown | -24.41% | -9.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUASX and FCPGX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QUASX vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, QUASX achieves a 26.35% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 29.08% return. Over the past 10 years, QUASX has underperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of 3.24%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.98% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QUASX vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUASX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QUASX vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QUASX vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison
QUASX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.32% | 8.37% | 16.99% |
Drawdowns
QUASX vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUASX drawdown since its inception was -81.67%, which is greater than FCPGX's maximum drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUASX and FCPGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QUASX vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison
AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) at 6.02%. This indicates that QUASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.