QUASX vs. APGAX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX).
QUASX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Feb 12, 1969. APGAX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Oct 1, 1996.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QUASX or APGAX.
Key characteristics
| QUASX | APGAX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 26.35% | 27.22% |
| 1Y Return | 49.01% | 34.92% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -8.42% | 5.29% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.26% | 13.12% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.24% | 9.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.36 | 2.21 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.18 | 2.95 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.39 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.02 | 2.16 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.34 | 10.45 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.76% | 3.34% |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.30% | 15.78% |
| Max Drawdown | -81.67% | -69.97% |
| Current Drawdown | -24.41% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUASX and APGAX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QUASX vs. APGAX - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QUASX having a 26.35% return and APGAX slightly higher at 27.22%. Over the past 10 years, QUASX has underperformed APGAX with an annualized return of 3.24%, while APGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.42% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QUASX vs. APGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUASX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than APGAX's 0.84% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QUASX vs. APGAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QUASX vs. APGAX - Dividend Comparison
Neither QUASX nor APGAX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.01% | 0.00% |
APGAX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
QUASX vs. APGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUASX drawdown since its inception was -81.67%, which is greater than APGAX's maximum drawdown of -69.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUASX and APGAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QUASX vs. APGAX - Volatility Comparison
AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) at 4.69%. This indicates that QUASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.