QUAL vs. PSCX
QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. QUAL is passively managed, while PSCX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QUAL returned 11.96%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for PSCX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QUAL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.
Performance
QUAL vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.11% return.
QUAL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 6M
- 8.86%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
PSCX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 15.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
QUAL vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 8.80% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 30.88% | -20.50% | 26.94% | 2.05% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 5.11% | 12.08% | 13.27% | 16.57% | -7.35% | 9.03% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUAL and PSCX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between QUAL and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
QUAL vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QUAL
PSCX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QUAL
PSCX
Financial Services
QUAL
PSCX
Communication Services
QUAL
PSCX
Consumer Cyclical
QUAL
PSCX
Healthcare
QUAL
PSCX
Industrials
QUAL
PSCX
Consumer Defensive
QUAL
PSCX
Energy
QUAL
PSCX
Utilities
QUAL
PSCX
Real Estate
QUAL
PSCX
Basic Materials
QUAL
PSCX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUAL vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
QUAL
PSCX
QUAL vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QUAL | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.58 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 3.70 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.00 | 18.94 | -7.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QUAL | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 2.82 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.20 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 1.27 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
QUAL vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and PSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUAL | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.06% | -10.20% | -23.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -4.20% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.00% | -9.61% | -8.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | -10.20% | -18.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.12% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -1.87% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 0.82% | +1.16% |
Volatility
QUAL vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 0.89%. This indicates that QUAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUAL | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.51% | 0.89% | +1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 4.21% | +4.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.83% | 5.53% | +6.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 7.07% | +10.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 6.96% | +11.14% |
QUAL vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QUAL vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.88% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUAL and PSCX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUAL has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to PSCX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs PSCX's -10.20%.
On 5-year performance, QUAL leads with 11.96% vs 8.46% for PSCX. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 11.96% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.
QUAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.75% for PSCX.
PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUAL and PSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer