PSCX vs. CNAV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PSCX returned 14.18% vs 72.20% for CNAV. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCX charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

PSCX vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCX achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 46.16% return.

PSCX

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -0.08%
• YTD: 4.46%
• 6M: 4.60%
• 1Y: 14.18%
• 3Y*: 12.23%
• 5Y*: 8.22%
• 10Y*: —

CNAV

• 1D: -6.27%
• 1M: 10.31%
• YTD: 46.16%
• 6M: 43.90%
• 1Y: 72.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCX vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	4.46%	12.08%	2.05%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	46.16%	16.80%	6.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCX and CNAV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024	0.70

The correlation between PSCX and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PSCX vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 84
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 84
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 79
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCX vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSCX	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	2.51	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.75	3.04	+0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.42	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	5.59	-2.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.03	22.08	-5.06

PSCX vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCX and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSCX vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCX drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCX and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCX	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.20%	-30.06%	+19.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.20%	-12.97%	+8.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-6.27%	+5.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-5.38%	+3.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	3.28%	-2.45%

Volatility

PSCX vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) is 1.79%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 16.51%. This indicates that PSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSCX	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.79%	16.51%	-14.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.52%	25.55%	-21.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.65%	28.97%	-23.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.11%	29.02%	-21.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.97%	29.02%	-22.05%

PSCX vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSCX vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSCX nor CNAV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSCX and CNAV in my portfolio?

PSCX and CNAV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSCX or CNAV?

CNAV has higher volatility (16.51%) compared to PSCX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCX dropped -10.20% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

Which ETF is better, PSCX or CNAV?

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 72.20% vs 14.18% for PSCX. On fees, PSCX is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSCX or CNAV?

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 72.20% return vs 14.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSCX or CNAV?

PSCX is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSCX or CNAV?

PSCX and CNAV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PSCX and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSCX and 1.31% for CNAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.