QTUM vs. KULR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, QTUM returned 28.09%/yr vs -28.07%/yr for KULR. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

QTUM vs. KULR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 47.39% return, which is significantly higher than KULR's 28.04% return.

QTUM

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 9.88%
• YTD: 47.39%
• 6M: 45.72%
• 1Y: 82.93%
• 3Y*: 48.15%
• 5Y*: 28.09%
• 10Y*: —

KULR

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: -6.42%
• YTD: 28.04%
• 6M: -0.26%
• 1Y: -61.48%
• 3Y*: -12.23%
• 5Y*: -28.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTUM vs. KULR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	47.39%	36.65%	50.54%	39.86%	-28.80%	35.18%	42.05%	47.99%	-19.44%
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	28.04%	-89.58%	1,818.92%	-84.58%	-56.52%	87.76%	-2.00%	-42.31%	-3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM and KULR is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018	0.28

Over the past year, QTUM and KULR have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

QTUM vs. KULR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 90
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

KULR

KULR Risk / Return Rank: 18
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 21
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTUM vs. KULR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QTUM	KULR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.94	-0.58	+3.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	-0.56	+4.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	0.94	+0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.46	-0.79	+6.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.77	-1.06	+20.82

QTUM vs. KULR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTUM Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the KULR Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM and KULR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QTUM vs. KULR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum KULR drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and KULR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTUM	KULR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.45%	-97.23%	+58.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.26%	-78.04%	+62.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.39%	-94.74%	+69.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.45%	-96.86%	+58.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.42%	-90.13%	+85.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.24%	-66.25%	+58.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.21%	60.77%	-56.56%

Volatility

QTUM vs. KULR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is 14.18%, while KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a volatility of 38.71%. This indicates that QTUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KULR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTUM	KULR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.18%	38.71%	-24.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.17%	77.01%	-53.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.39%	105.97%	-77.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.99%	126.04%	-99.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.40%	127.06%	-99.66%

Dividends

QTUM vs. KULR - Dividend Comparison

QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.73%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTUM and KULR in my portfolio?

QTUM and KULR have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTUM or KULR?

KULR has higher volatility (38.71%) compared to QTUM (14.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs KULR's -97.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.