QTR vs. TPYP
QTR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QTR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index, while TPYP is a MLPs fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTR returned 19.48%/yr vs 23.42%/yr for TPYP. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.
Performance
QTR vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTR achieves a 12.56% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 20.31% return.
QTR
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- YTD
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 19.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.84%
TPYP
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 10.96%
- YTD
- 20.31%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 18.93%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.60K | $22.40K | $39.13K | |
| $2.68M | $2.32M | $2.66M |
QTR vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 12.56% | 14.52% | 21.46% | 45.53% | -29.94% | 4.16% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 20.31% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | 16.09% | 5.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTR and TPYP is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021 | 0.21 |
The correlation between QTR and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QTR vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTR
TPYP
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QTR
TPYP
-
Communication Services
QTR
TPYP
-
Consumer Cyclical
QTR
TPYP
-
Consumer Defensive
QTR
TPYP
-
Healthcare
QTR
TPYP
-
Industrials
QTR
TPYP
Utilities
QTR
TPYP
Basic Materials
QTR
TPYP
Energy
QTR
TPYP
Financial Services
QTR
TPYP
Real Estate
QTR
TPYP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTR vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank
QTR
TPYP
QTR vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTR | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.25 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | 7.64 | -2.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTR vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum TPYP drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and TPYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTR | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -51.91% | +20.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -6.84% | -5.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.99% | -13.17% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | -5.54% | +1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.68% | -7.82% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 2.91% | +1.18% |
Volatility
QTR vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) at 4.74%. This indicates that QTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTR | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 4.74% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 11.18% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 13.98% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 17.41% | +0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 21.90% | -3.57% |
QTR vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTR vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison
QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.59%, more than TPYP's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 16.59% | 18.77% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.28% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTR and TPYP have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTR has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to TPYP (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTR dropped -31.72% vs TPYP's -51.91%.
On 3-year performance, TPYP leads with 23.42% vs 19.48% for QTR. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 23.42% return vs 19.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTR.
QTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.59%, compared with 3.28% for TPYP.
QTR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while TPYP is MLPs. QTR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QTR and 0.40% for TPYP.
TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTR and TPYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer