QTR vs. QTEC
QTR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF) and QTEC (First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QTR tracks the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index while QTEC tracks the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTR returned 22.93%/yr vs 32.86%/yr for QTEC. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QTEC.
Performance
QTR vs. QTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTR achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly lower than QTEC's 44.73% return.
QTR
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 10.52%
- YTD
- 17.64%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- 1Y
- 33.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTEC
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 22.39%
- YTD
- 44.73%
- 6M
- 40.31%
- 1Y
- 67.84%
- 3Y*
- 32.86%
- 5Y*
- 17.61%
- 10Y*
- 23.00%
QTR vs. QTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 17.64% | 14.52% | 21.46% | 45.53% | -29.94% | 4.16% |
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 44.73% | 22.28% | 7.32% | 67.02% | -39.83% | 5.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTR and QTEC is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between QTR and QTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
QTR vs. QTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTR
QTEC
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QTR
QTEC
Communication Services
QTR
QTEC
Consumer Cyclical
QTR
QTEC
Consumer Defensive
QTR
QTEC
-
Healthcare
QTR
QTEC
-
Industrials
QTR
QTEC
Utilities
QTR
QTEC
-
Basic Materials
QTR
QTEC
-
Energy
QTR
QTEC
-
Financial Services
QTR
QTEC
-
Real Estate
QTR
QTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTR vs. QTEC — Risk / Return Rank
QTR
QTEC
QTR vs. QTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTR | QTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 2.97 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.22 | 3.67 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.47 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 4.25 | -1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.47 | 13.77 | -4.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTR | QTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.97 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.60 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
QTR vs. QTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum QTEC drawdown of -58.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and QTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTR | QTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -58.86% | +27.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -16.03% | +3.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.99% | -29.00% | +10.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | 0.00% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -9.89% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 4.94% | -1.37% |
Volatility
QTR vs. QTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is 4.52%, while First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that QTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTR | QTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 7.34% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 18.26% | -7.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.14% | 22.98% | -8.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 29.19% | -11.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 27.51% | -9.41% |
QTR vs. QTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QTEC's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTR vs. QTEC - Dividend Comparison
QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.96%, while QTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.44% | 0.68% | 0.91% | 0.80% | 1.29% | 0.99% |
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 15.96% | 18.77% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTR and QTEC have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTEC has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to QTR (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTR dropped -31.72% vs QTEC's -58.86%.
On 3-year performance, QTEC leads with 32.86% vs 22.93% for QTR. On fees, QTEC is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QTR has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QTEC has performed better with a 32.86% return vs 22.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTEC is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTR.
QTR has the higher dividend yield at 15.96%, compared with 0.00% for QTEC.
QTR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index, while QTEC tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QTR and 0.57% for QTEC.
QTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTR and QTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer