PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTEC vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTEC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTEC achieves a 44.73% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, QTEC has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 23.00%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.56% annualized return.


QTEC

1D
0.07%
1M
22.39%
YTD
44.73%
6M
40.31%
1Y
67.84%
3Y*
32.86%
5Y*
17.61%
10Y*
23.00%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTEC vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
44.73%22.28%7.32%67.02%-39.83%26.89%38.76%48.22%-4.62%37.78%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QTEC and VOO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.84

The correlation between QTEC and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTEC vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QTEC
VOO

Technology

87.9%
35.7%

Communication Services

6.2%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
10.2%

Industrials

1.9%
8.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Technology

QTEC
87.9%
VOO
35.7%

Communication Services

QTEC
6.2%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QTEC
4.0%
VOO
10.2%

Industrials

QTEC
1.9%
VOO
8.3%

Basic Materials

QTEC

-

VOO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

QTEC

-

VOO
4.9%

Energy

QTEC

-

VOO
3.5%

Financial Services

QTEC

-

VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

QTEC

-

VOO
8.5%

Real Estate

QTEC

-

VOO
1.9%

Utilities

QTEC

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTEC vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTEC
QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTEC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTECVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

3.16

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

14.73

-0.96

QTEC vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTEC and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTECVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

2.39

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.83

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.87

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.89

-0.28

Drawdowns

QTEC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTEC drawdown since its inception was -58.86%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTEC and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTECVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.86%

-33.99%

-24.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.03%

-8.90%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.00%

-18.69%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.54%

-24.52%

-21.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.54%

-33.99%

-11.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.89%

-3.69%

-6.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

1.91%

+3.03%

Volatility

QTEC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that QTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTECVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.34%

2.84%

+4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.26%

8.90%

+9.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.98%

11.80%

+11.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.19%

16.81%

+12.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.51%

18.01%

+9.50%

QTEC vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTEC has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTEC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

QTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.02%0.14%0.15%0.02%0.44%0.68%0.91%0.80%1.29%0.99%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTEC and VOO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTEC has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTEC dropped -58.86% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, QTEC leads with 23.00% vs 15.56% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QTEC has performed better with a 23.00% return vs 15.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for QTEC.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for QTEC.

QTEC is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VOO is S&P 500. QTEC tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QTEC and 0.03% for VOO.

QTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTEC and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer