PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTEC vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTEC vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTEC achieves a 43.17% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 30.49% return. Over the past 10 years, QTEC has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 22.85%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.62% annualized return.


QTEC

1D
-1.08%
1M
18.57%
YTD
43.17%
6M
39.34%
1Y
64.90%
3Y*
32.59%
5Y*
17.36%
10Y*
22.85%

VGT

1D
-0.88%
1M
14.99%
YTD
30.49%
6M
28.76%
1Y
58.31%
3Y*
33.33%
5Y*
22.01%
10Y*
25.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTEC vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
43.17%22.28%7.32%67.02%-39.83%26.89%38.76%48.22%-4.62%37.78%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
30.49%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between QTEC and VGT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2006

0.92

The correlation between QTEC and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTEC vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QTEC
VGT

Technology

87.9%
98.5%

Communication Services

6.2%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
0.1%

Industrials

1.9%
0.4%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.3%

Financial Services

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

QTEC
87.9%
VGT
98.5%

Communication Services

QTEC
6.2%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QTEC
4.0%
VGT
0.1%

Industrials

QTEC
1.9%
VGT
0.4%

Basic Materials

QTEC

-

VGT
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

QTEC

-

VGT

-

Energy

QTEC

-

VGT
0.3%

Financial Services

QTEC

-

VGT
0.5%

Healthcare

QTEC

-

VGT
0.0%

Real Estate

QTEC

-

VGT

-

Utilities

QTEC

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTEC vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTEC
QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTEC vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTECVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.46

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

3.57

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.17

11.41

+1.76

QTEC vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTEC and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTECVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

2.85

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.88

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

1.04

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.68

-0.08

Drawdowns

QTEC vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTEC drawdown since its inception was -58.86%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTEC and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTECVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.86%

-54.63%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.03%

-16.40%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.00%

-27.23%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.54%

-35.07%

-10.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.54%

-35.07%

-10.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-2.35%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.89%

-7.95%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

5.13%

-0.19%

Volatility

QTEC vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 6.51%. This indicates that QTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTECVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.51%

6.51%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.24%

16.09%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.97%

20.55%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.17%

25.17%

+4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.50%

24.60%

+2.90%

QTEC vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTEC has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTEC vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

QTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.02%0.14%0.15%0.02%0.44%0.68%0.91%0.80%1.29%0.99%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTEC and VGT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTEC has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to VGT (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTEC dropped -58.86% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.62% vs 22.85% for QTEC. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.62% return vs 22.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for QTEC.

VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for QTEC.

QTEC is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VGT is Technology Equities. QTEC tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QTEC and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTEC and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer