QTR vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QTR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QTR tracks the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index while QQQM tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTR returned 20.74%/yr vs 26.15%/yr for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

QTR vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTR achieves a 14.00% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 16.48% return.

QTR

• 1D: -2.27%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 14.00%
• 6M: 12.63%
• 1Y: 28.74%
• 3Y*: 20.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: -3.30%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 16.48%
• 6M: 15.00%
• 1Y: 34.99%
• 3Y*: 26.15%
• 5Y*: 16.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTR vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF	14.00%	14.52%	21.46%	45.53%	-29.94%	4.16%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	16.48%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	6.44%

Correlation

The correlation between QTR and QQQM is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021	0.92

The correlation between QTR and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTR vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QTR	QQQM
Technology	59.2%	58.7%
Communication Services	13.2%	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	6.4%
Healthcare	3.7%	3.7%
Industrials	3.3%	2.6%
Utilities	1.1%	1.2%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.0%
Energy	0.5%	0.5%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QTR vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTR

QTR Risk / Return Rank: 53
QTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
QTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
QTR Omega Ratio Rank: 55
QTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
QTR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 60
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTR vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QTR	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.97	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.58	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.35	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	2.94	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.86	10.88	-3.02

QTR vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTR and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QTR vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTR	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.72%	-35.04%	+3.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.29%	-11.96%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.99%	-22.70%	+3.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	-4.24%	+0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.77%	-8.20%	-0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	3.22%	+0.44%

Volatility

QTR vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is 8.36%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that QTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTR	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.36%	9.00%	-0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.86%	14.43%	-1.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.96%	17.85%	-1.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.35%	22.53%	-4.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.35%	22.30%	-3.95%

QTR vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTR vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.47%, more than QQQM's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.44%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF	16.47%	18.77%	0.50%	0.53%	0.36%	1.90%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTR and QQQM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, QTR and QQQM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QTR or QQQM?

QQQM has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to QTR (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTR dropped -31.72% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which ETF is better, QTR or QQQM?

On 3-year performance, QQQM leads with 26.15% vs 20.74% for QTR. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QTR has been the lower-risk option at 8.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTR or QQQM?

Over the 3-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 26.15% return vs 20.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTR or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTR or QQQM?

QTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.47%, compared with 0.44% for QQQM.

What is the main difference between QTR and QQQM?

QTR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QTR and 0.15% for QQQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.