QTJL vs. SENT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTJL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while SENT is a Long-Short fund tracking the Actively Managed. QTJL is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTJL returned 19.20%/yr vs -3.03%/yr for SENT. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.

Performance

QTJL vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QTJL

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 7.15%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: 19.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTJL vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.15%	21.07%	16.50%	42.39%	-30.16%	9.32%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	-6.03%	-18.25%	0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between QTJL and SENT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	0.53

The correlation between QTJL and SENT shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QTJL vs. SENT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QTJL	SENT
Technology	54.2%	26.2%
Communication Services	15.5%	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	3.1%
Healthcare	4.2%	24.8%
Industrials	2.8%	14.6%
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.2%	3.0%
Energy	0.6%	10.3%
Financial Services	0.2%	6.1%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QTJL vs. SENT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 68
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTJL vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTJL	SENT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.23	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTJL	SENT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	-0.25	+0.77

Drawdowns

QTJL vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTJL drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, which is greater than SENT's maximum drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJL and SENT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTJL	SENT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.40%	-30.34%	-3.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.68%	0.00%	-6.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.43%	-15.83%	-6.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-27.23%	+27.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.94%	-20.90%	+12.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.27%	0.00%	+1.27%

Volatility

QTJL vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) has a higher volatility of 0.31% compared to AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) at 0.00%. This indicates that QTJL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTJL	SENT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.31%	0.00%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.61%	0.00%	+7.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.01%	0.00%	+10.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.42%	12.66%	+7.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.42%	13.32%	+7.10%

QTJL vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTJL vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTJL nor SENT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTJL and SENT in my portfolio?

QTJL and SENT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTJL or SENT?

QTJL has higher volatility (0.31%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTJL dropped -33.40% vs SENT's -30.34%.

Which ETF is better, QTJL or SENT?

On 3-year performance, QTJL leads with 19.20% vs -3.03% for SENT. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTJL or SENT?

Over the 3-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 19.20% return vs -3.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTJL or SENT?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SENT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTJL or SENT?

QTJL and SENT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QTJL and SENT?

QTJL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SENT is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTJL and 1.01% for SENT.