QTEC vs. QQMG
QTEC (First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund) and QQMG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QTEC tracks the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index while QQMG tracks the Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTEC returned 32.59%/yr vs 29.47%/yr for QQMG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTEC charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQMG.
Performance
QTEC vs. QQMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTEC achieves a 43.17% return, which is significantly higher than QQMG's 21.45% return.
QTEC
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 18.57%
- YTD
- 43.17%
- 6M
- 39.34%
- 1Y
- 64.90%
- 3Y*
- 32.59%
- 5Y*
- 17.36%
- 10Y*
- 22.85%
QQMG
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 9.97%
- YTD
- 21.45%
- 6M
- 20.28%
- 1Y
- 43.12%
- 3Y*
- 29.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTEC vs. QQMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 43.17% | 22.28% | 7.32% | 67.02% | -39.83% | 4.00% |
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.45% | 22.16% | 25.66% | 55.00% | -31.56% | 5.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTEC and QQMG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between QTEC and QQMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
QTEC vs. QQMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTEC
QQMG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QTEC
QQMG
Communication Services
QTEC
QQMG
Consumer Cyclical
QTEC
QQMG
Industrials
QTEC
QQMG
Basic Materials
QTEC
-
QQMG
Consumer Defensive
QTEC
-
QQMG
Energy
QTEC
-
QQMG
-
Financial Services
QTEC
-
QQMG
Healthcare
QTEC
-
QQMG
Real Estate
QTEC
-
QQMG
Utilities
QTEC
-
QQMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTEC vs. QQMG — Risk / Return Rank
QTEC
QQMG
QTEC vs. QQMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTEC | QQMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.43 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 3.42 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.17 | 12.72 | +0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTEC | QQMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | 2.58 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.73 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
QTEC vs. QQMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTEC drawdown since its inception was -58.86%, which is greater than QQMG's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTEC and QQMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTEC | QQMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.86% | -35.43% | -23.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.03% | -12.67% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.00% | -22.79% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -0.75% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.89% | -9.60% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.94% | 3.40% | +1.54% |
Volatility
QTEC vs. QQMG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) at 4.80%. This indicates that QTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTEC | QQMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.51% | 4.80% | +2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | 12.88% | +5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.97% | 16.77% | +6.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.17% | 23.59% | +5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.50% | 23.59% | +3.91% |
QTEC vs. QQMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTEC has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than QQMG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTEC vs. QQMG - Dividend Comparison
QTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.34% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.60% | 0.82% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.44% | 0.68% | 0.91% | 0.80% | 1.29% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTEC and QQMG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTEC has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to QQMG (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTEC dropped -58.86% vs QQMG's -35.43%.
On 3-year performance, QTEC leads with 32.59% vs 29.47% for QQMG. On fees, QQMG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QQMG has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QTEC has performed better with a 32.59% return vs 29.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQMG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for QTEC.
QQMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for QTEC.
QTEC tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index, while QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QTEC and 0.20% for QQMG.
QTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTEC and QQMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer