PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTEC vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTEC vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTEC achieves a 30.45% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 17.31% return. Over the past 10 years, QTEC has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 21.23%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.99% annualized return.


QTEC

1D
-1.23%
1M
-7.41%
6M
26.73%
YTD
30.45%
1Y
38.73%
3Y*
24.65%
5Y*
14.41%
10Y*
21.23%

FDL

1D
-0.25%
1M
4.29%
6M
13.11%
YTD
17.31%
1Y
24.45%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTEC vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
30.45%22.28%7.32%67.02%-39.83%26.89%38.76%48.22%-4.62%37.78%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
17.31%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between QTEC and FDL is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2006

0.50

The correlation between QTEC and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QTEC vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QTEC
FDL

Technology

89.8%
1.4%

Communication Services

5.8%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
4.7%

Industrials

1.4%
3.9%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

14.4%

Energy

-

25.7%

Financial Services

-

15.2%

Healthcare

-

17.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

6.5%

Technology

QTEC
89.8%
FDL
1.4%

Communication Services

QTEC
5.8%
FDL
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

QTEC
3.0%
FDL
4.7%

Industrials

QTEC
1.4%
FDL
3.9%

Basic Materials

QTEC

-

FDL
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

QTEC

-

FDL
14.4%

Energy

QTEC

-

FDL
25.7%

Financial Services

QTEC

-

FDL
15.2%

Healthcare

QTEC

-

FDL
17.6%

Real Estate

QTEC

-

FDL

-

Utilities

QTEC

-

FDL
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTEC vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTEC
QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTEC vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTECFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

5.75

-3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

13.11

-5.81

QTEC vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTEC and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTEC vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTEC drawdown since its inception was -58.86%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTEC and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTECFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.86%

-65.93%

+7.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.03%

-4.27%

-11.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.00%

-12.24%

-16.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.54%

-16.46%

-29.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.54%

-41.40%

-4.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.56%

-0.25%

-10.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-9.61%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.32%

1.87%

+3.45%

Volatility

QTEC vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a higher volatility of 10.95% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 4.93%. This indicates that QTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTECFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.95%

4.93%

+6.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.41%

8.61%

+14.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.51%

11.79%

+15.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.95%

14.41%

+15.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.82%

17.13%

+10.69%

QTEC vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTEC has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTEC vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

QTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than FDL's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.61%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
0.01%0.00%0.02%0.14%0.15%0.02%0.44%0.68%0.91%0.80%1.29%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTEC and FDL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTEC has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to FDL (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTEC dropped -58.86% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, QTEC leads with 21.23% vs 10.99% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QTEC has performed better with a 21.23% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for QTEC.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.01% for QTEC.

QTEC is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. QTEC tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QTEC and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTEC and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer