QTAC vs. TBFG
QTAC (Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF) and TBFG (The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTAC charges 1.78%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for TBFG.
Performance
QTAC vs. TBFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTAC achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than TBFG's 10.35% return.
QTAC
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 14.39%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBFG
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 24.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAC vs. TBFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QTAC Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF | 3.12% | 0.37% |
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF | 10.35% | 0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTAC and TBFG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTAC vs. TBFG — Risk / Return Rank
QTAC
TBFG
QTAC vs. TBFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF (QTAC) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTAC | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 1.38 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
QTAC vs. TBFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTAC drawdown since its inception was -16.56%, which is greater than TBFG's maximum drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAC and TBFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTAC | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.56% | -13.43% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.36% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.70% | -1.63% | -5.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.76% | — |
Volatility
QTAC vs. TBFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTAC | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.15% | 9.73% | +14.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 10.95% | +13.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 10.95% | +13.20% |
QTAC vs. TBFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTAC has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFG's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTAC vs. TBFG - Dividend Comparison
QTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than TBFG's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QTAC Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF | 2.35% | 2.65% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTAC and TBFG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TBFG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TBFG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.78% for QTAC.
TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.05% for QTAC.
They also come from different issuers: Q3 Asset Management and The Brinsmere Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.78% for QTAC and 0.42% for TBFG.
Find the right allocation for QTAC and TBFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer