PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTAC vs. WAMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTAC vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF (QTAC) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QTAC

1D
-0.36%
1M
3.48%
YTD
1.27%
6M
0.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WAMA

1D
-0.58%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTAC vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QTAC and WAMA is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTAC vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF (QTAC) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QTAC vs. WAMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTAC vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTAC drawdown since its inception was -16.56%, which is greater than WAMA's maximum drawdown of -4.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAC and WAMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTACWAMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.56%

-4.37%

-12.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-2.01%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-1.06%

-5.44%

Volatility

QTAC vs. WAMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTACWAMADifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.75%

14.02%

+13.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.75%

14.02%

+13.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.75%

14.02%

+13.73%

QTAC vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTAC has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTAC vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison

QTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


QTAC and WAMA have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 1.78% for QTAC.

QTAC has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.

They also come from different issuers: Q3 Asset Management and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.78% for QTAC and 0.32% for WAMA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTAC and WAMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer