PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTAC vs. LOTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTAC vs. LOTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF (QTAC) and Liberty One Tactical Income ETF (LOTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTAC achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly higher than LOTI's 2.75% return.


QTAC

1D
0.56%
1M
14.60%
YTD
3.43%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LOTI

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
2.75%
6M
2.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTAC vs. LOTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QTAC and LOTI is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTAC vs. LOTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF (QTAC) and Liberty One Tactical Income ETF (LOTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QTAC vs. LOTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTACLOTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.86

-0.50

Drawdowns

QTAC vs. LOTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTAC drawdown since its inception was -16.56%, which is greater than LOTI's maximum drawdown of -4.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAC and LOTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTACLOTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.56%

-4.42%

-12.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-2.41%

+2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-1.33%

-5.42%

Volatility

QTAC vs. LOTI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTACLOTIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.25%

5.69%

+18.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.25%

5.69%

+18.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.25%

5.69%

+18.56%

QTAC vs. LOTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTAC has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than LOTI's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTAC vs. LOTI - Dividend Comparison

QTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than LOTI's 1.33% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


QTAC and LOTI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LOTI is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LOTI is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.78% for QTAC.

LOTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.05% for QTAC.

They also come from different issuers: Q3 Asset Management and Liberty One. Their fees differ too: 1.78% for QTAC and 1.01% for LOTI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTAC and LOTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer