QTAC vs. RHRX
QTAC (Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF) and RHRX (RH Tactical Rotation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTAC charges 1.78%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for RHRX.
Performance
QTAC vs. RHRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTAC achieves a 2.57% return, which is significantly lower than RHRX's 21.23% return.
QTAC
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 11.97%
- YTD
- 2.57%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RHRX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 21.23%
- 6M
- 21.28%
- 1Y
- 40.56%
- 3Y*
- 22.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAC vs. RHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QTAC Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF | 2.57% | 0.37% |
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF | 21.23% | 0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTAC and RHRX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTAC vs. RHRX — Risk / Return Rank
QTAC
RHRX
QTAC vs. RHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF (QTAC) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTAC | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.53 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
QTAC vs. RHRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTAC drawdown since its inception was -16.56%, smaller than the maximum RHRX drawdown of -25.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAC and RHRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTAC | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.56% | -25.33% | +8.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -0.40% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -8.95% | +2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.74% | — |
Volatility
QTAC vs. RHRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTAC | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.06% | 13.18% | +10.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.06% | 19.03% | +5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.06% | 19.03% | +5.03% |
QTAC vs. RHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTAC has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than RHRX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTAC vs. RHRX - Dividend Comparison
QTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while RHRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QTAC Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF | 0.05% | 0.05% |
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTAC and RHRX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RHRX is cheaper at 1.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RHRX is cheaper with a 1.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.78% for QTAC.
QTAC has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for RHRX.
They also come from different issuers: Q3 Asset Management and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 1.78% for QTAC and 1.36% for RHRX.
Find the right allocation for QTAC and RHRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer