QSOL vs. XMMO
QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
QSOL vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSOL achieves a -43.81% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 22.90% return.
QSOL
- 1D
- -5.21%
- 1M
- -18.27%
- YTD
- -43.81%
- 6M
- -44.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 22.90%
- 6M
- 20.25%
- 1Y
- 35.75%
- 3Y*
- 31.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- 20.13%
QSOL vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -43.81% | -4.28% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 22.90% | -0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSOL and XMMO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSOL vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
QSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XMMO
QSOL vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSOL | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSOL vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, roughly equal to the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSOL and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSOL | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.55% | -55.37% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.76% | -2.42% | -50.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.92% | -9.43% | -24.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility
QSOL vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSOL | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.31% | 19.94% | +52.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.31% | 21.65% | +50.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.31% | 22.33% | +49.98% |
QSOL vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSOL vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than XMMO's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.57% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSOL and XMMO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
QSOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.57% for XMMO.
QSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XMMO is Momentum. QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QSOL and 0.35% for XMMO.
Find the right allocation for QSOL and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer