QSOL vs. BFOC
QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. QSOL is passively managed, while BFOC is actively managed. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.
Performance
QSOL vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSOL achieves a -40.22% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.46% return.
QSOL
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- -9.11%
- 6M
- -36.54%
- YTD
- -40.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BFOC
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- -7.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.88K | $50.79K | $63.29K | |
| $123.54K | $80.36K | $100.95K |
QSOL vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -40.22% | -4.28% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.46% | -1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSOL and BFOC is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSOL vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSOL vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSOL and BFOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSOL | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.55% | -18.41% | -38.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.74% | -18.26% | -31.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.35% | -13.50% | -22.85% |
Volatility
QSOL vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSOL | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.60% | 11.68% | +57.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.60% | 11.68% | +57.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.60% | 11.68% | +57.92% |
QSOL vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSOL vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison
QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSOL and BFOC have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.
QSOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
QSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QSOL and 0.90% for BFOC.
Find the right allocation for QSOL and BFOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer