QSOL vs. DECO
QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) and DECO (State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while DECO is a Blockchain fund actively managed by State Street. QSOL is passively managed, while DECO is actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DECO.
Performance
QSOL vs. DECO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSOL achieves a -43.81% return, which is significantly lower than DECO's 79.33% return.
QSOL
- 1D
- -5.21%
- 1M
- -18.27%
- YTD
- -43.81%
- 6M
- -44.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DECO
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 14.67%
- YTD
- 79.33%
- 6M
- 71.45%
- 1Y
- 167.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QSOL vs. DECO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -43.81% | -4.28% |
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 79.33% | -6.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSOL and DECO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSOL vs. DECO — Risk / Return Rank
QSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DECO
QSOL vs. DECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSOL | DECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSOL vs. DECO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than DECO's maximum drawdown of -47.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSOL and DECO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSOL | DECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.55% | -47.71% | -8.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.76% | -1.75% | -51.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.92% | -11.41% | -22.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.18% | — |
Volatility
QSOL vs. DECO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSOL | DECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.31% | 44.86% | +27.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.31% | 51.31% | +21.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.31% | 51.31% | +21.00% |
QSOL vs. DECO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DECO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSOL vs. DECO - Dividend Comparison
QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than DECO's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 0.64% | 1.16% | 1.73% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSOL and DECO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DECO.
QSOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.64% for DECO.
QSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while DECO is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QSOL and 0.65% for DECO.
Find the right allocation for QSOL and DECO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer