QSOL vs. SPHD
QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.
Performance
QSOL vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSOL achieves a -41.51% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 4.38% return.
QSOL
- 1D
- -4.67%
- 1M
- -14.50%
- YTD
- -41.51%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHD
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 4.38%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.08%
QSOL vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -41.51% | -0.92% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.38% | -0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSOL and SPHD is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSOL vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
QSOL
SPHD
QSOL vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QSOL | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | 0.58 | -1.57 |
Drawdowns
QSOL vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSOL drawdown since its inception was -50.82%, which is greater than SPHD's maximum drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSOL and SPHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSOL | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.82% | -41.39% | -9.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.82% | -5.37% | -45.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.98% | -4.70% | -27.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.93% | — |
Volatility
QSOL vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSOL | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.59% | 11.04% | +59.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.59% | 14.16% | +56.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.59% | 17.64% | +52.95% |
QSOL vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSOL vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than SPHD's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.62% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSOL and SPHD have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.
SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.20% for QSOL.
QSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SPHD is Dividend. QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QSOL and 0.30% for SPHD.
Find the right allocation for QSOL and SPHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer